264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20925694)
21. [Quantitative structure activity relationship models based on heuristic method and gene expression programming for the prediction of the pK(a) values of sulfa drugs].
Li YQ; Si HZ; Xiao YL; Liu CH; Xia CC; Li K; Qi YX
Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2009 May; 44(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 19618723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. QSPR studies of impact sensitivity of nitro energetic compounds using three-dimensional descriptors.
Xu J; Zhu L; Fang D; Wang L; Xiao S; Liu L; Xu W
J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Jun; 36():10-9. PubMed ID: 22503858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
Talevi A; Goodarzi M; Ortiz EV; Duchowicz PR; Bellera CL; Pesce G; Castro EA; Bruno-Blanch LE
Eur J Med Chem; 2011 Jan; 46(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21112128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advances in the replacement and enhanced replacement method in QSAR and QSPR theories.
Mercader AG; Duchowicz PR; Fernández FM; Castro EA
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jul; 51(7):1575-81. PubMed ID: 21644502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of descriptors based on Lipinski's rules in the QSPR study of aqueous solubilities.
Duchowicz PR; Talevi A; Bellera C; Bruno-Blanch LE; Castro EA
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Jun; 15(11):3711-9. PubMed ID: 17418580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of critical points in the electron density as descriptors by building quantitative structure-property relationships for the atomic polar tensor.
Buttingsrud B; Alsberg BK; Astrand PO
J Comput Chem; 2007 Oct; 28(13):2130-9. PubMed ID: 17464968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative structure-property relationships for pesticides in biopartitioning micellar chromatography.
Ma W; Luan F; Zhang H; Zhang X; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan B
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Apr; 1113(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 16490199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting the auto-ignition temperatures of organic compounds from molecular structure using support vector machine.
Pan Y; Jiang J; Wang R; Cao H; Cui Y
J Hazard Mater; 2009 May; 164(2-3):1242-9. PubMed ID: 18952371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Replacement method and enhanced replacement method versus the genetic algorithm approach for the selection of molecular descriptors in QSPR/QSAR theories.
Mercader AG; Duchowicz PR; Fernández FM; Castro EA
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Sep; 50(9):1542-8. PubMed ID: 20722426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genetic algorithm as a variable selection procedure for the simulation of 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of flavonoid derivatives using multiple linear regression.
Ghavami R; Najafi A; Sajadi M; Djannaty F
J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Sep; 27(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 18450488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds.
Baert B; Deconinck E; Van Gele M; Slodicka M; Stoppie P; Bodé S; Slegers G; Vander Heyden Y; Lambert J; Beetens J; De Spiegeleer B
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Nov; 15(22):6943-55. PubMed ID: 17827020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 1. Applications of genetic algorithms to the prediction of blood-brain partitioning of a large set of drugs.
Hou T; Xu X
J Mol Model; 2002 Dec; 8(12):337-49. PubMed ID: 12541001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In silico identification of bioisosteric functional groups.
Ertl P
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 17554854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In silico ADME modelling: prediction models for blood-brain barrier permeation using a systematic variable selection method.
Narayanan R; Gunturi SB
Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 13(8):3017-28. PubMed ID: 15781411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative structure-retention relationship for the Kovats retention indices of a large set of terpenes: a combined data splitting-feature selection strategy.
Hemmateenejad B; Javadnia K; Elyasi M
Anal Chim Acta; 2007 May; 592(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 17499073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Theoretical characterization of gas-liquid chromatographic stationary phases with quantum chemical descriptors.
Hoffmann EA; Fekete ZA; Rajkó R; Pálinkó I; Körtvélyesi T
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Mar; 1216(12):2540-7. PubMed ID: 19195662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of solubility parameters using partial least square regression.
Tantishaiyakul V; Worakul N; Wongpoowarak W
Int J Pharm; 2006 Nov; 325(1-2):8-14. PubMed ID: 16839717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New QSPR equations for prediction of aqueous solubility for military compounds.
Muratov EN; Kuz'min VE; Artemenko AG; Kovdienko NA; Gorb L; Hill F; Leszczynski J
Chemosphere; 2010 May; 79(8):887-90. PubMed ID: 20233619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. QSAR modeling of the interaction of flavonoids with GABA(A) receptor.
Duchowicz PR; Vitale MG; Castro EA; Autino JC; Romanelli GP; Bennardi DO
Eur J Med Chem; 2008 Aug; 43(8):1593-602. PubMed ID: 18158201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. QSPR prediction of flash point of esters by means of GFA and ANFIS.
Khajeh A; Modarress H
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jul; 179(1-3):715-20. PubMed ID: 20381958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
