344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20926248)
21. A single-incision technique for placement of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein.
Seo TS; Song MG; Kang EY; Lee CH; Yong HS; Doo K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 24613268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.
Otsubo R; Hatachi T; Shibata K; Yoshida T; Watanabe H; Oikawa M; Matsumoto M; Yano H; Taniguchi H; Nagayasu T
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 113(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 26645575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective evaluation on external jugular vein cut-down approach for TIVAD implantation.
Cavallaro G; Iorio O; Iossa A; De Angelis F; Avallone M; Massaro M; Mattia C; Silecchia G
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 13():243. PubMed ID: 26264364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Totally implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer. Experience at a private oncology center].
Cortés-Flores AO; Morgan-Villela G; Juárez-Uzeta EA; Fuentes-Orozco C; Jiménez-Tornero J; González-Ojeda A
Cir Cir; 2012; 80(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23351446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cephalic Vein Cut-Down Method for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Single-Institution Experience.
Hataoka T; Sanmoto Y; Kinuta S
Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Jan; 98():244-250. PubMed ID: 37356657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Totally implantable venous access devices: The supraclavicular percutaneous approach and early complications.
Bai XM; Wang J; Zhou Y; Sun XW; Cheng L; Gu XS; Yuan Q; Jing J; Zhang J; Gu LY; Jin Y
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1575-1581. PubMed ID: 33565502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
Kagawa T; Ueyama S; Kobayashi T; Okabayashi H; Kuroda S; Fujiwara T
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
Karanlik H; Kurul S
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay.
Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D
J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cutdowns for totally implantable access ports to central veins.
Kulaylat M; Karakousis CP
Vascular; 2009; 17(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 19769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Central venous infusion port inserted via high versus low jugular venous approaches: retrospective comparison of outcome and complications.
Park HS; Kim YI; Lee SH; Kim JI; Seo H; Lee SM; Lee Y; Lim MK; Park YS
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):494-8. PubMed ID: 19200682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is catheter rupture rare after totally implantable access port implantation via the right internal jugular vein? Report of a case.
Nagasawa Y; Shimizu T; Sonoda H; Chou H; Mekata E; Tani T
Surg Today; 2014 Jul; 44(7):1346-9. PubMed ID: 23732842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost effectiveness of different central venous approaches for port placement and use in adult oncology patients: evidence from a randomized three-arm trial.
Biffi R; Pozzi S; Bonomo G; Della Vigna P; Monfardini L; Radice D; Rotmensz N; Zampino MG; Fazio N; Orsi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Nov; 21(12):3725-31. PubMed ID: 24841352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].
Li H; Gao YX; Wang SL; Yao HX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Dec; 54(6):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 36533350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
Povoski SP
World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients.
Seiler CM; Frohlich BE; Dorsam UJ; Kienle P; Buchler MW; Knaebel HP
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jan; 93(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 16353193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Innominate vein stenosis in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.
Song MG; Seo TS; Kang EY; Yong HS; Seo JH; Choi YY
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25953212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
Staszewicz W; Naiken SP; Mennet A; Meyer J; Righini M; Morel P; Toso C
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
