272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20926653)
1. Distinct frontoparietal networks set the stage for later perceptual identification priming and episodic recognition memory.
Wimber M; Heinze HJ; Richardson-Klavehn A
J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(40):13272-80. PubMed ID: 20926653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding.
Uncapher MR; Hutchinson JB; Wagner AD
J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 31(35):12613-28. PubMed ID: 21880922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
Long NM; Kuhl BA
J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autobiographical memory retrieval and hippocampal activation as a function of repetition and the passage of time.
Nadel L; Campbell J; Ryan L
Neural Plast; 2007; 2007():90472. PubMed ID: 18274617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual and Semantic Representations at Encoding Contribute to True and False Recognition of Objects.
Naspi L; Hoffman P; Devereux B; Morcom AM
J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(40):8375-8389. PubMed ID: 34413205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elaboration versus suppression of cued memories: influence of memory recall instruction and success on parietal lobe, default network, and hippocampal activity.
Gimbel SI; Brewer JB
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89037. PubMed ID: 24586492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aberrant frontoparietal function during recognition memory in schizophrenia: a multimodal neuroimaging investigation.
Weiss AP; Ellis CB; Roffman JL; Stufflebeam S; Hamalainen MS; Duff M; Goff DC; Schacter DL
J Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 29(36):11347-59. PubMed ID: 19741141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory load influences perceptual ambiguity by competing for fronto-parietal attentional resources.
Intaitė M; Duarte JV; Castelo-Branco M
Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():142-151. PubMed ID: 27590722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory: expectancy violation or successful retrieval?
O'Connor AR; Han S; Dobbins IG
J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(8):2924-34. PubMed ID: 20181590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful episodic memory retrieval of newly learned faces activates a left fronto-parietal network.
Leube DT; Erb M; Grodd W; Bartels M; Kircher TT
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 18(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 14659501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval.
Xiao X; Dong Q; Gao J; Men W; Poldrack RA; Xue G
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(11):2986-2998. PubMed ID: 28202612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medial temporal lobe activity at recognition increases with the duration of mnemonic delay during an object working memory task.
Picchioni M; Matthiasson P; Broome M; Giampietro V; Brammer M; Mathes B; Fletcher P; Williams S; McGuire P
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1235-50. PubMed ID: 17358019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State-related and item-related neural correlates of successful memory encoding.
Otten LJ; Henson RN; Rugg MD
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1339-44. PubMed ID: 12402040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural correlates of spatial working memory in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing visual and tactile processes.
Ricciardi E; Bonino D; Gentili C; Sani L; Pietrini P; Vecchi T
Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):339-49. PubMed ID: 16324793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common and specific brain regions in high- versus low-confidence recognition memory.
Kim H; Cabeza R
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():103-13. PubMed ID: 19501072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociation of mnemonic and perceptual processes during spatial and nonspatial working memory using fMRI.
Belger A; Puce A; Krystal JH; Gore JC; Goldman-Rakic P; McCarthy G
Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 9673660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Common cortical and subcortical targets of the dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices in the rhesus monkey: evidence for a distributed neural network subserving spatially guided behavior.
Selemon LD; Goldman-Rakic PS
J Neurosci; 1988 Nov; 8(11):4049-68. PubMed ID: 2846794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study.
van der Ham IJ; Raemaekers M; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; Postma A
Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():70-9. PubMed ID: 19651111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. fMRI response during figural memory task performance in college drinkers.
Dager AD; Jamadar S; Stevens MC; Rosen R; Jiantonio-Kelly RE; Sisante JF; Raskin SA; Tennen H; Austad CS; Wood RM; Fallahi CR; Pearlson GD
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Jan; 231(1):167-79. PubMed ID: 23949205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory and visual connectivity gradients in frontoparietal cortex.
Braga RM; Hellyer PJ; Wise RJ; Leech R
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Jan; 38(1):255-270. PubMed ID: 27571304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
