BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20926913)

  • 1. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 english in South Africa.
    Swerts M; Zerbian S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(3):127-46. PubMed ID: 20926913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
    Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Production of lexical stress in non-native speakers of American English: kinematic correlates of stress and transfer.
    Chakraborty R; Goffman L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):821-35. PubMed ID: 21106699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosodic Disambiguation in First and Second Language Production: English and Korean.
    Baek H
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):598-624. PubMed ID: 34605716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Sources of Accent in Second Language Japanese Speech.
    Idemaru K; Wei P; Gubbins L
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 29764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The homogeneity of audibility and prosody of Zulu words for speech reception threshold (SRT) testing.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2009; 56():60-75. PubMed ID: 20235494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological indices of bilingualism: oral-motor coordination and speech rate in Bengali-English speakers.
    Chakraborty R; Goffman L; Smith A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 18367680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring speech production and comprehension: Where is the second-language delay?
    Broos WP; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30270750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual restoration of locally time-reversed speech: Non-native listeners' performance in their L2 vs. L1.
    Ishida M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2675-2693. PubMed ID: 33861429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and Articulatory Characteristics of English Semivowels /ɹ, l, w/ Produced by Adult Second-Language Speakers.
    Kim Y; Chung H; Thompson A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 65(3):890-905. PubMed ID: 35104414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of American English vowels and consonants spoken by international students in the United States.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):583-96. PubMed ID: 24686793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the South African Spondaic and CID W-1 wordlists for measuring speech recognition threshold.
    Hanekom T; Soer M; Pottas L
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2015 Jun; 62(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 26304218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voicing Assimilation in Czech and Slovak Speakers of English: Interactions of Segmental Context, Language and Strength of Foreign Accent.
    Skarnitzl R; Šturm P
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):427-453. PubMed ID: 28915782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First and second language tongue movements in Spanish and Korean bilingual speakers.
    Nissen SL; Dromey C; Wheeler C
    Phonetica; 2007; 64(4):201-16. PubMed ID: 18421243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
    Kallio H; Suni A; Šimko J
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):571-597. PubMed ID: 34479458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of lexical characteristics and talker accent on the recognition of English words by native speakers of Korean.
    Choi MK; Holliday JJ; Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):769. PubMed ID: 34470323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for the listener: comparing the production of contrastive intonation in typically-developing speakers and speakers with autism.
    Kaland C; Swerts M; Krahmer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2182-96. PubMed ID: 23967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.