These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20927163)

  • 1. Reassessing Cartwright--understanding the factual record.
    Bunkle P
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):88-94. PubMed ID: 20927163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A response to Dr Paul Patten. Re: a particular relationship.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):102. PubMed ID: 20927165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A patient's response to recent criticisms of the findings in the report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry 1988.
    Matheson C
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):95-101. PubMed ID: 20927164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective study: response to Dr McCredie. Re: consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3.
    Bryder L
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):104. PubMed ID: 20927167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting an error but inadequate treatment of cervical cancer still occurred.
    Matheson C
    N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):83. PubMed ID: 20930917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
    McCredie M
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
    Richardson A
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):118. PubMed ID: 20720614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
    Chalmers I
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):109-12. PubMed ID: 20717187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
    Manning J
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):113-4. PubMed ID: 20720612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
    Overton E
    N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):84. PubMed ID: 20930918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice.
    Raffle AE; Gray JAM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():A8-A13. PubMed ID: 32448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research into the Cartwright Inquiry.
    Bryder L
    N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):114-5. PubMed ID: 19182853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cervical smears in the study of intraepithelial neoplasms].
    Varleta L; Salas O; Toledo P; Iglesias J; Tisné L; Dabancens A; Lorenzetti L
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1978; 43(6):344-51. PubMed ID: 550214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinician's response to the abnormal smear.
    Gordon H
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 7261528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical diagnosis of early cervical cancer.
    Stafl A
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1969 Jul; 24(7 Pt 2):976-80. PubMed ID: 5212441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
    Baird T
    N Z Med J; 2004 Oct; 117(1204):U1136. PubMed ID: 15505677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The occurrence of isolated dysplastic and carcinoma in situ type cells in cervical smears from patients with dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: significance to prescreening using image processing techniques.
    Feldman M; Poulsen R; Shepherd L; Marshall KG
    Acta Cytol; 1973; 17(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 4517951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New concepts in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Roy M; Townsend DE; DiSaia PJ; Morrow CP
    J Fam Pract; 1974; 1(3-4):10-3. PubMed ID: 4141723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix].
    Michon B; Demianczuk N
    Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.