312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20927527)
21. Golay pulse encoding for microbubble contrast imaging in ultrasound.
Leavens C; Williams R; Foster FS; Burns PN; Sherar MD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Oct; 54(10):2082-90. PubMed ID: 18019246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in rodent kidneys as an absolute quantitative method for measuring blood perfusion.
Kogan P; Johnson KA; Feingold S; Garrett N; Guracar I; Arendshorst WJ; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):900-8. PubMed ID: 21601135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early Predictors of the Long-term Response to Therapy in Patients With Crohn Disease Derived From a Time-Intensity Curve Analysis After Microbubble Contrast Agent Injection.
Quaia E; Gennari AG; Cova MA
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Apr; 38(4):947-958. PubMed ID: 30208230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intrahepatic transit time predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: quantitative assessment with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Li N; Ding H; Fan P; Lin X; Xu C; Wang W; Xu Z; Wang J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1066-75. PubMed ID: 20620694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A new technique for assessing renal transplant perfusion preoperatively using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS)--a porcine model pilot study.
Stenberg B; Talbot D; Khurram M; Kanwar A; Ray C; Mownah O; White K; Elliott ST
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E8-13. PubMed ID: 22179806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring Absolute Blood Perfusion in Mice Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Shirinifard A; Thiagarajan S; Johnson MD; Calabrese C; Sablauer A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1628-1638. PubMed ID: 28522149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hepatic perfusion imaging using factor analysis of contrast enhanced ultrasound.
Lueck GJ; Kim TK; Burns PN; Martel AL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1449-57. PubMed ID: 18815097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison and evaluation of indicator dilution models for bolus of ultrasound contrast agents.
Harabis V; Kolar R; Mezl M; Jirik R
Physiol Meas; 2013 Feb; 34(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 23348425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radial modulation of microbubbles for ultrasound contrast imaging.
Bouakaz A; Versluis M; Borsboom J; de Jong N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2283-90. PubMed ID: 18051162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of conventional time-intensity curves vs. maximum intensity over time for post-processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Palmowski M; Lederle W; Gaetjens J; Socher M; Hauff P; Bzyl J; Semmler W; Günther RW; Kiessling F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e149-53. PubMed ID: 19945241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging.
Crocco M; Palmese M; Sciallero C; Trucco A
Ultrasonics; 2009 Jan; 49(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18703210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion in humans.
Emanuel AL; Meijer RI; van Poelgeest E; Spoor P; Serné EH; Eringa EC
Microcirculation; 2020 Jan; 27(1):e12588. PubMed ID: 31465606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Flow quantification with nakagami parametric imaging for suppressing contrast microbubbles attenuation.
Gu X; Wei M; Zong Y; Jiang H; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):660-9. PubMed ID: 23384469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative analysis of in-vivo microbubble distribution in the human brain.
Prada F; Gennari AG; Linville IM; Mutersbaugh ME; Chen Z; Sheybani N; DiMeco F; Padilla F; Hossack JA
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11797. PubMed ID: 34083642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents.
Zhao S; Kruse DE; Ferrara KW; Dayton PA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2055-72. PubMed ID: 17404455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nonlinear Imaging of Microbubble Contrast Agent Using the Volterra Filter: In Vivo Results.
Du J; Liu D; Ebbini ES
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2069-2081. PubMed ID: 27705855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of two distinct hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia patient subsets with different hepatic perfusion properties by combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with perfusion imaging quantification.
Schelker RC; Andorfer K; Putz F; Herr W; Jung EM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215178. PubMed ID: 30973932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.
Chen CC; Sirsi SR; Homma S; Borden MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 22305060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative assessment of bone microvascularization after osteocutaneous flap transplantation using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Geis S; Prantl L; Mueller S; Gosau M; Lamby P; Jung EM
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 23709242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of renal perfusion.
Mahoney M; Sorace A; Warram J; Samuel S; Hoyt K
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1427-37. PubMed ID: 25063408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
