853 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20927557)
1. Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2011 Apr; 20(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 20927557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Feng Zhang Z; Qing Li C; Jie Zheng W; Liu J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 22614266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease].
Zhang W; Duan L; Shang X; Xu X; Hu Y; He R
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 23672122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study on the technique and efficacy of microscope-assisted MI-TLIF and naked-eye MI-TLIF in lumbar revision surgery.
Zhang J; Yuan Y; Gao H; Liao B; Qian J; Yan X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 38297343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease.
Gu G; Zhang H; Fan G; He S; Cai X; Shen X; Guan X; Zhou X
Int Orthop; 2014 Apr; 38(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 24240484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.
Hammad A; Wirries A; Ardeshiri A; Nikiforov O; Geiger F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 14(1):229. PubMed ID: 31331364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Lee KH; Yue WM; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Tan SB
Eur Spine J; 2012 Nov; 21(11):2265-70. PubMed ID: 22453894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Biradicular Symptoms.
Liu C; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 120():e72-e79. PubMed ID: 30055359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation.
Liu C; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():14-20. PubMed ID: 27773858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
Wang HW; Hu YC; Wu ZY; Wu HR; Wu CF; Zhang LS; Xu WK; Fan HL; Cai JS; Ma JQ
Orthop Surg; 2017 Aug; 9(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 28960820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
