These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20929191)
1. Proton pros and cons. Some cite dearth of studies on effectiveness; others see therapy's unique value. Rhea S Mod Healthc; 2010 Sep; 40(39):30, 32. PubMed ID: 20929191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proton beam therapy and the convoluted pathway to incorporating emerging technology into routine medical care in the United States. Steinberg ML; Konski A Cancer J; 2009; 15(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 19672151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Process enhancement by using MultiLeaf Collimator (MLC) technology. Chessman M J Oncol Manag; 1998; 7(5):26-32. PubMed ID: 10187175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A question of value. Montagnolo AJ Trustee; 2011 Mar; 64(3):25-6, 1. PubMed ID: 21491836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loma Linda expected to be initial test site for proton cancer therapy. Carter K Mod Healthc; 1986 Oct; 16(22):96, 98. PubMed ID: 10279079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The pros and cons of consensus statements. Kalberer JT Bull Am Coll Surg; 1981 Nov; 66(11):15-6. PubMed ID: 10252954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Technology: focus on management grows in face of high costs. Devey GB Hospitals; 1981 Apr; 55(7):169-73. PubMed ID: 7009380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The high cost of medical technology: who's to blame? Ham FL Bus Health; 1989 Nov; 7(11):22-4, 26, 28-31. PubMed ID: 10296085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Harnessing technology. Havighurst C Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(2):8. PubMed ID: 10165996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Technology, the biggest health-care cost-driver of all. Can we curb its rise? Terry K Med Econ; 1994 Mar; 71(6):124-37. PubMed ID: 10132718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Technology: a strategic factor in hospital planning. Wheeler KE; Porter-O'Grady T; Barrell CT Health Care Manage Rev; 1985; 10(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 3988512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pros and cons of marketing technology. MacStravic RS Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):36-9, 44. PubMed ID: 10290383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The pursuit of PET. Webster W Adm Radiol J; 1996 Oct; 15(10):17-20. PubMed ID: 10164839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of technology in the long-term care for the aged. Haber PA Med Instrum; 1982; 16(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 6801444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Government's impact on medical technologies. Cotter DJ Healthc Forum J; 1989; 32(5):26, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10303840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The medical technologist and evaluation of health technologies. Peddecord KM Am J Med Technol; 1980 Jan; 46(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7352464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When doctors say Yes and insurers No. Kolata G Med Econ; 1992 Nov; 69(22):87, 90-1, 94-5. PubMed ID: 10122553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of technology on health care cost and policy development. Wallner PE; Konski A Semin Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jul; 18(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 18513629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health care technology assessment: implications for modern medical practice. Part I. Understanding technology adoption and analyses. Pierce RG; Bozic KJ; Hall BL; Breivis J Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17460869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]