BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20929716)

  • 1. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Maret D; Molinier F; Braga J; Peters OA; Telmon N; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Cossié A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
    Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
    Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography.
    Wang Y; He S; Yu L; Li J; Chen S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 22008300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of simulated root resorption lacunas based on cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang Y; He S; Guo Y; Wang S; Chen S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Aug; 16(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23419069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy.
    Michetti J; Maret D; Mallet JP; Diemer F
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1187-90. PubMed ID: 20630296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
    Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
    Maret D; Peters OA; Dedouit F; Telmon N; Sixou M
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 May; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
    Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography.
    Oliveira ML; Tosoni GM; Lindsey DH; Mendoza K; Tetradis S; Mallya SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 23522649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols.
    Forst D; Nijjar S; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Secanell M; Lagravere M
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):69. PubMed ID: 25534123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
    de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photoacoustic tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography versus micro-computed tomography: Accuracy of 3D reconstructions of human teeth.
    Schneider SJM; Höhne C; Schneider M; Schmitter M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0274818. PubMed ID: 36534651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements between cone beam computed tomography and 3D microtomography.
    Mangione F; Meleo D; Talocco M; Pecci R; Pacifici L; Bedini R
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2013; 49(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 24071605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of tooth displacement from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Chen J; Li S; Fang S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 19732674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method.
    Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Telmon N; Calvet A; Michetti J; Maret D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170220. PubMed ID: 28937285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate registration of cone-beam computed tomography scans to 3-dimensional facial photographs.
    Nahm KY; Kim Y; Choi YS; Lee J; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 24485741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.