206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20929816)
1. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
Travis J
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Falsification charge highlights image-manipulation standards.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):356. PubMed ID: 18927360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.
Service RF
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. For the record.
Krimsky S
Nat Genet; 2002 Feb; 30(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 11818959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Behavioral ecology. Ecologists roiled by misconduct case.
Vogel G; Proffitt F; Stone R
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5658):606-9. PubMed ID: 14752133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Referencing retracted articles.
Emmett M
Am J Med; 2006 Jul; 119(7):e7. PubMed ID: 16828619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
Tavare A
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific publishing. Hoax-detecting software spots fake papers.
Bohannon J
Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6230):18-9. PubMed ID: 25838360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
