These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20930189)

  • 1. An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and wales.
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Howard PD
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):443-70. PubMed ID: 20930189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders.
    Wakeling HC; Howard P; Barnett G
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Mar; 23(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 21349831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders.
    Firestone P; Nunes KL; Moulden H; Broom I; Bradford JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A large-scale evaluation of Risk Matrix 2000 in Scotland.
    Grubin D
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 21965466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis.
    Cortoni F; Hanson RK; Coache MÈ
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 21098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales.
    Friendship C; Mann RE; Beech AR
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Jul; 18(7):744-59. PubMed ID: 14675507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The significance of offending behavior for predicting sexual recidivism among sex offenders of various age groups.
    Janka C; Gallasch-Nemitz F; Biedermann J; Dahle KP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 22425764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16598660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: an investigation of predictive and incremental validity.
    Eher R; Matthes A; Schilling F; Haubner-Maclean T; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):5-28. PubMed ID: 21537058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female and male sex offenders: a comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors.
    Freeman NJ; Sandler JC
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1394-413. PubMed ID: 18349348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. General and victim-specific empathy: associations with actuarial risk, treatment outcome, and sexual recidivism.
    Brown S; Harkins L; Beech AR
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Oct; 24(5):411-30. PubMed ID: 22179773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incarceration and recidivism among sexual offenders.
    Nunes KL; Firestone P; Wexler AF; Jensen TL; Bradford JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 17203411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: a multi-site study of static-2002.
    Hanson RK; Helmus L; Thornton D
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 19536646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.