252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20930353)
1. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
Rani S; Ravi MS
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients.
Biondi K; Lorusso P; Fastuca R; Mangano A; Zecca PA; Bosco M; Caprioglio A; Levrini L
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 26949239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
Kerr WJ; Ford I
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities.
Jung WS; Kim H; Jeon DM; Mah SJ; Ahn SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1108-15. PubMed ID: 23618835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values.
Katayama K; Yamaguchi T; Sugiura M; Haga S; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23985034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1249-60. PubMed ID: 23562358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
