252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20930353)
21. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental-skeletal dimensions in growing individuals with variations in the lower facial height.
Enoki C; Telles Cde S; Matsumoto MA
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15322649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Base of the skull morphology and Class III malocclusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Tinano MM; Martins MA; Bendo CB; Mazzieiro Ê
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25741829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mandibular growth comparisons of Class I and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns.
Jacob HB; Buschang PH
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):755-61. PubMed ID: 24524578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Study on the association of ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle in young females with different vertical craniofacial morphology.
Li HT; Cui CJ; Lu SL; He KY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 18989598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Masseter muscle thickness and vertical cephalometric characteristics in children with Class II malocclusion.
Tentolouri E; Antonarakis GS; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Jun; 8(3):729-736. PubMed ID: 35150084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion.
Grippaudo C; Oliva B; Greco AL; Sferra S; Deli R
Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24326093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults.
Kubota M; Nakano H; Sanjo I; Satoh K; Sanjo T; Kamegai T; Ishikawa F
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 9825556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
Baik CY; Ververidou M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study.
Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant' Anna EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):799-809. PubMed ID: 23726330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography.
Satiroğlu F; Arun T; Işik F
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16135538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
Anwar N; Fida M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
