107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20930897)
1. Defendants of the Cartwright Inquiry are unable to provide a description of 'adequate care' for cervical carcinoma in situ.
Chalmers I
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1322):85-7. PubMed ID: 20930897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?
Chalmers I
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):109-12. PubMed ID: 20717187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Unfortunate Experiment debate: Manning response to Chalmers.
Manning J
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):113-4. PubMed ID: 20720612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Confusion surrounding the unfortunate experiment.
Overton E
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1323):84. PubMed ID: 20930918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Response to the Missing Manuscript editorial.
Richardson A
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):118. PubMed ID: 20720614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. No new evidence on the cervical cancer study.
Paul C; Holloway L
N Z Med J; 1990 Dec; 103(903):581-3. PubMed ID: 2255455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Toilet of the portio: a reliable technic for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical lesions].
Blanda A; Gambaro C
Minerva Ginecol; 1987 Oct; 39(10):723-6. PubMed ID: 3431740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why did so many women develop cancer? Part 2.
Jones RW
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):106-7; author reply 107-8. PubMed ID: 20717186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A response to Professor Bryder's comments on 'Consequences in women of participating in a study of the natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1320):115-7. PubMed ID: 20720613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research into the Cartwright Inquiry.
Bryder L
N Z Med J; 2009 Jan; 122(1288):114-5. PubMed ID: 19182853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clare Matheson protests too much.
Smith V
N Z Med J; 2010 Sep; 123(1322):88-90. PubMed ID: 20930898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical research after Auckland.
Gerber P; Coppleson M
Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 2716616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cartwright report.
Mackay M
N Z Med J; 1991 Mar; 104(908):125. PubMed ID: 2011297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive potential of carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Morris M
Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9057):967. PubMed ID: 9100618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [I. Uterine cervical neoplasms 2. Strategy for treatment of adenocarcinoma in situ of uterine cervix and the role of chemotherapy ].
Hongo A
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2012 Feb; 39(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 22545284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Colposcopy and the conservative management of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.
Chanen W; Hollyock VE
Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Apr; 43(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 4817004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proceedings: An assessment of the biology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Richart RM
Proc Natl Cancer Conf; 1972; 7():219-22. PubMed ID: 4764902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A response to Ms Sandercock and Dr Burls regarding the methods used in the analysis for our first paper 'Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3'.
McCredie M
N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):105-7. PubMed ID: 20927168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix and its malignant potential. A lesson from New Zealand.
Chang AR
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2101679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implications for Australia of the New Zealand report of the cervical cancer inquiry: no cause for complacency.
McNeill PM
Med J Aust; 1989 Mar; 150(5):264-8, 271. PubMed ID: 2716624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
