These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20931232)
1. Relative importance of top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs of Sarracenia pitcher communities at a northern and a southern site. Hoekman D Oecologia; 2011 Apr; 165(4):1073-82. PubMed ID: 20931232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Turning up the heat: temperature influences the relative importance of top-down and bottom-up effects. Hoekman D Ecology; 2010 Oct; 91(10):2819-25. PubMed ID: 21058543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Species-specific differences determine responses to a resource pulse and predation. Miller TE; Buhler ML; Cuellar-Gempeler C Oecologia; 2019 May; 190(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 30941498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermediate-consumer identity and resources alter a food web with omnivory. Kneitel JM J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):651-9. PubMed ID: 17584370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The bacterial composition within the Sarracenia purpurea model system: local scale differences and the relationship with the other members of the food web. Gray SM; Akob DM; Green SJ; Kostka JE PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50969. PubMed ID: 23227224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predator diet breadth influences the relative importance of bottom-up and top-down control of prey biomass and diversity. Jiang L; Morin PJ Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):350-63. PubMed ID: 15729665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predator identity more than predator richness structures aquatic microbial assemblages in Sarracenia purpurea leaves. Canter EJ; Cuellar-Gempeler C; Pastore AI; Miller TE; Mason OU Ecology; 2018 Mar; 99(3):652-660. PubMed ID: 29370451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple interaction types determine the impact of ant predation of caterpillars in a forest community. Clark RE; Farkas TE; Lichter-Marck I; Johnson ER; Singer MS Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3379-3388. PubMed ID: 27861790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Species richness and trophic diversity increase decomposition in a co-evolved food web. Baiser B; Ardeshiri RS; Ellison AM PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20672. PubMed ID: 21673992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A keystone predator controls bacterial diversity in the pitcher-plant (Sarracenia purpurea) microecosystem. Peterson CN; Day S; Wolfe BE; Ellison AM; Kolter R; Pringle A Environ Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 10(9):2257-66. PubMed ID: 18479443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities. terHorst CP Am Nat; 2010 Dec; 176(6):675-85. PubMed ID: 20955011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predator dispersal influences predator distribution but not prey diversity in pitcher plant microbial metacommunities. Cuellar-Gempeler C; terHorst CP; Mason OU; Miller T Ecology; 2023 Apr; 104(4):e3912. PubMed ID: 36335567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of microalgae communities in the Phytotelmata of allochthonous populations of Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae). Gebühr C; Pohlon E; Schmidt AR; Küsel K Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2006 Nov; 8(6):849-60. PubMed ID: 17066365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Top predators affect the composition of naive protist communities, but only in their early-successional stage. Zander A; Gravel D; Bersier LF; Gray SM Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):519-28. PubMed ID: 26501772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]