These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20931308)
1. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. van Egmond N; De Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):562-73. PubMed ID: 20931308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components. Paxton ES; Keeney JA; Maloney WJ; Clohisy JC Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 20922585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years? Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old. Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years. Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft]. Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects. García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up. Schreurs BW; Thien TM; de Waal Malefijt MC; Buma P; Veth RP; Slooff TJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 12672840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years. Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 21691908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients. Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients. Busch V; Klarenbeek R; Slooff T; Schreurs BW; Gardeniers J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3214-20. PubMed ID: 20405346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects? Hansen E; Shearer D; Ries MD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 20857251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components. Perlbach R; Palm L; Mohaddes M; Ivarsson I; Schilcher J Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 32009433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips. Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture at 3-18 years. Schreurs BW; Zengerink M; Welten ML; van Kampen A; Slooff TJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):145-51. PubMed ID: 16056042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kang JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):943-50. PubMed ID: 24163094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty. Kostensalo I; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Mokka J; Koivisto M; Mäkelä KT Scand J Surg; 2015 Dec; 104(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 25681057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects. Waddell BS; Boettner F; Gonzalez Della Valle A J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):919-923. PubMed ID: 27817994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Cruz-Pardos A; Garcia-Rey E; Ortega-Chamarro J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3304-13. PubMed ID: 20499294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]