BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20932708)

  • 1. Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.
    Skyttä ET; Eskelinen A; Paavolainen PO; Remes VM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 20932708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cementless acetabular socket revisions using Metasul metal-on-metal bearings.
    Park KS; Yoon TR; Song EK; Lee KB
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 19493650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term survivorship of cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components in patients > 75 years of age.
    Levy BA; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10884206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cementless hemispheric acetabular component for acetabular revision arthroplasty: a 5- to 19-year follow-up study.
    Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Kim KI; Chun SW; Cheng JQ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 18358376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery.
    Mohaddes M; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 25399966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Successful femoral reconstruction with a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Skyttä ET; Eskelinen A; Remes V
    Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 22968248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good stability and minimal osteolysis with a biconical threaded cup at 10 years.
    Zweymüller KA; Steindl M; Schwarzinger U
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():128-37. PubMed ID: 17960675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing.
    Park YS; Park SJ; Lim SJ
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):796. PubMed ID: 21053885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 40 years of age and, if indicated, reconstruction of acetabular defects with bone impaction grafting].
    de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A811. PubMed ID: 20482927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiological evaluation of modular trabecular metal acetabular cups. Short-term results in 64 hips.
    Simon JP; Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Oct; 75(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 19999874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless hemispheric hydroxyapatite-coated sockets for acetabular revision.
    Geerdink CH; Schaafsma J; Meyers WG; Grimm B; Tonino AJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 17400093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unsatisfactory results with the cementless Omnifit acetabular component due to polyethylene and severe osteolysis.
    Nieuwenhuis JJ; Malefijt Jde W; Hendriks JC; Gosens T; Bonnet M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Jun; 71(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 16035702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acetabular fixation options: first-generation modular cup curtain calls and caveats.
    Hamilton WG; Calendine CL; Beykirch SE; Hopper RH; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17570283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
    Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0-24 years.
    Eskelinen A; Paavolainen P; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Remes V
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 17260192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
    Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survivorship of second-generation metal-on-metal primary total hip replacement.
    Neuerburg C; Impellizzeri F; Goldhahn J; Frey P; Naal FD; von Knoch M; Leunig M; von Knoch F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 22094796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.