These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20932708)

  • 21. The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures.
    Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Mallory TH; Adams JB; Russell JH; Groseth KL
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):93-102. PubMed ID: 16214009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell.
    Flecher X; Sporer S; Paprosky W
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):949-55. PubMed ID: 18534494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Which is the best bearing surface for primary total hip replacement? A New Zealand Joint Registry study.
    Sharplin P; Wyatt MC; Rothwell A; Frampton C; Hooper G
    Hip Int; 2018 Jul; 28(4):352-362. PubMed ID: 29192727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Durom acetabular component. a concise follow-up of early revision rates at a minimum of 2 years.
    Hutt J; Dodd M; Briffa N; Bourke H; Hazlerigg A; Ward D
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 23100148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mortality after septic versus aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a matched-cohort study.
    Choi HR; Beecher B; Bedair H
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):56-8. PubMed ID: 23937921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No effect of delivery on total hip replacement survival: a nationwide register study in Finland.
    Kuitunen I; Skyttä ET; Artama M; Huhtala H; Eskelinen A
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):433-438. PubMed ID: 31225762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.
    Sadoghi P; Thaler M; Janda W; Hübl M; Leithner A; Labek G
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1349-53. PubMed ID: 23535284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Skyttä ET; Koivu H; Eskelinen A; Ikävalko M; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 20180720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A commentary on "Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (Int J Surg 2022;100:106597).
    Ding H; Feng GJ; Liu LM
    Int J Surg; 2022 Jun; 102():106687. PubMed ID: 35642828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A commentary on "Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (Int J Surg 2022;100:106597).
    Su Q; Wan X; Wang D; Zhou Z
    Int J Surg; 2022 Jul; 103():106660. PubMed ID: 35568307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Aseptic, simultaneous and bilateral mobilisation due to an acetabular shell fracture in a 43 year-old patient].
    Ceretti M; Fanelli M; Pappalardo S
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2014; 58(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 24360788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does Using Highly Porous Tantalum in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mirghaderi P; Eshraghi N; Sheikhbahaei E; Razzaghof M; Roustai-Geraylow K; Pouramini A; Eraghi MM; Kafi F; Javad Mortazavi SM
    Arthroplast Today; 2024 Feb; 25():101293. PubMed ID: 38298809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forged to heal: The role of metallic cellular solids in bone tissue engineering.
    Marin E
    Mater Today Bio; 2023 Dec; 23():100777. PubMed ID: 37727867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.
    Concina C; Crucil M; Gherlinzoni F
    Acta Biomed; 2022 Mar; 92(S3):e2021549. PubMed ID: 35604256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Femoral Head and Liner Exchange in Patients with Atraumatic Dislocation. Results of a Retrospective Study with 6 Years Follow-Up.
    Hanslmeier MG; Maier MW; Feisst M; Beckmann NA
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 34833405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cup-cage construct for massive acetabular defect in revision hip arthroplasty- A case series with medium to long-term follow-up.
    Arvinte D; Kiran M; Sood M
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2020; 11(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 32001986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.
    Salem Eid A; Kotb A; Elshabrawy W
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2020; 11(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 32001985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 20 years of porous tantalum in primary and revision hip arthroplasty-time for a critical appraisal.
    Hailer N
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Jun; 89(3):254-255. PubMed ID: 29726759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Eskelinen A; Rolfson O; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Jun; 89(3):259-264. PubMed ID: 29400118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do dual-mobility cups cemented into porous tantalum shells reduce the risk of dislocation after revision surgery?
    Brüggemann A; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Apr; 89(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 29400106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.