These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20932709)

  • 1. Design and primary application of computer-assisted, patient-specific navigational templates in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Zhang YZ; Lu S; Yang Y; Xu YQ; Li YB; Pei GX
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1083-7. PubMed ID: 20932709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip.
    Zhang YZ; Chen B; Lu S; Yang Y; Zhao JM; Liu R; Li YB; Pei GX
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 22113980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelley TC; Swank ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19182044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of computed tomography-based navigation for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Nakamura N; Nishii T; Kitada M; Iwana D; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 23523215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates.
    Kunz M; Rudan JF; Xenoyannis GL; Ellis RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 19464848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip in metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing].
    Lin LJ; Jin AM; Fang GF; Li JY; Ding C; Cheng WY; Wei GJ; Li Q
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Aug; 28(8):1452-3. PubMed ID: 18753085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted vs conventional mechanical jig technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Resubal JR; Morgan DA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 18534413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Huang Q; Shen B; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1811-5. PubMed ID: 23618750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing - a clinical study.
    Le Duff MJ; Wisk LE; Amstutz HC
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 19583550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner.
    Malik A; Dorr LD; Long WT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):323.e13-6. PubMed ID: 18562156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study.
    Lass R; Kubista B; Olischar B; Frantal S; Windhager R; Giurea A
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):786-91. PubMed ID: 24290738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy and reliability of preoperative templating for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Choi JK; Geller JA; Wang W; Nyce JD; Macaulay W
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):765-70. PubMed ID: 20870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography-based navigation to determine the femoral neck osteotomy and location of the acetabular socket of an arthrodesed hip.
    Akiyama H; Kawanabe K; Ito T; Goto K; Nangaku M; Nakamura T
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1292.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19195838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Innovations in hip arthroplasty three-dimensional modeling and analytical technology (SOMA).
    Banerjee S; Faizan A; Nevelos J; Kreuzer S; Burgkart R; Harwin SF; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2014 Mar; 24():288-94. PubMed ID: 24574016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.
    Seyler TM; Lai LP; Sprinkle DI; Ward WG; Jinnah RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():71-80. PubMed ID: 18676940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award.
    Liu F; Gross TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1224-30. PubMed ID: 23540536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty.
    Whiddon DR; Bono JV; Lang JE; Smith EL; Salyapongse AK
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Aug; 40(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 22016868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design considerations for patient-specific surgical templates for total hip arthroplasty with respect to acetabular cartilage.
    Mueller S; Ahmad I; Kraemer M; Utz M; Gaa J; Kahrs LA; Ortmaier T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 May; 62(3):263-269. PubMed ID: 27371818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.