These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20932802)

  • 1. Is the quality of assisted reproduction treatment better in some countries than others?
    Grudzinskas G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):589. PubMed ID: 20932802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality.
    Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1046-8. PubMed ID: 15016768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment.
    Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1936-8. PubMed ID: 15217998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
    Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine morphological scoring systems in assisted reproduction treatment fail to reflect age-related impairment of oocyte and embryo quality.
    Stensen MH; Tanbo T; Storeng R; Byholm T; Fèdorcsak P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Jul; 21(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 20452822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Pouly JL; Larue L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17208496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.
    Tiitinen A; Hydén-Granskog C; Gissler M
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2439-41. PubMed ID: 15319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction?
    Messinis IE; Domali E
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1933-5. PubMed ID: 15192073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is there a single 'parameter of excellence'?
    Pinborg A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Nyboe Andersen A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1052-4. PubMed ID: 15044405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Assessing the BESST index for reproduction treatment.
    Davies MJ; Wang JX; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1049-51. PubMed ID: 15044408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of fetal oocytes in assisted reproduction.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S258-9. PubMed ID: 15363747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART.
    van Empel IW; Nelen WL; Hermens RP; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1242-5. PubMed ID: 18372252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous quality improvement and assisted reproductive technology multiple gestations: some progress, some answers, more questions.
    Gibbons W; Grainger D; Cedars M; Jain T; Klein N; Stern J;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 17693326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality.
    Bhattacharya S; Templeton A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1939-42. PubMed ID: 15217994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Hazout A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 17215161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implantation of the human embryo: clinical and epidemiological aspects.
    Delbaere I
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2008; 70(4):257-83. PubMed ID: 19166099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and optimization of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology treatment.
    Combelles CM; Racowsky C
    Semin Reprod Med; 2005 Aug; 23(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 16059834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining poor responders in assisted reproduction.
    Sallam HN; Ezzeldin F; Agameya AF; Rahman AF; El-Garem Y
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2005; 50(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 16279504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Singleton live births should also include preterm births.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1943-5. PubMed ID: 15243003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of patients' organizations in cross-border reproductive care.
    Thorn P; Dill S
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):e23-4. PubMed ID: 20056214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.