These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20933098)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment.
    Wilkoff BL; Bello D; Taborsky M; Vymazal J; Kanal E; Heuer H; Hecking K; Johnson WB; Young W; Ramza B; Akhtar N; Kuepper B; Hunold P; Luechinger R; Puererfellner H; Duru F; Gotte MJ; Sutton R; Sommer T;
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 20933098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.
    Gimbel JR; Bello D; Schmitt M; Merkely B; Schwitter J; Hayes DL; Sommer T; Schloss EJ; Chang Y; Willey S; Kanal E;
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 May; 10(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 23333721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical safety of the ProMRI pacemaker system in patients subjected to thoracic spine and cardiac 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanning conditions.
    Bailey WM; Mazur A; McCotter C; Woodard PK; Rosenthal L; Johnson W; Mela T;
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):464-71. PubMed ID: 26409098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI scanning in patients with new and existing CapSureFix Novus 5076 pacemaker leads: randomized trial results.
    Shenthar J; Milasinovic G; Al Fagih A; Götte M; Engel G; Wolff S; Tse HF; Herr J; Carrithers J; Cerkvenik J; Nähle CP
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):759-65. PubMed ID: 25556038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla.
    Martin ET; Coman JA; Shellock FG; Pulling CC; Fair R; Jenkins K
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 43(7):1315-24. PubMed ID: 15063447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design.
    Sutton R; Kanal E; Wilkoff BL; Bello D; Luechinger R; Jenniskens I; Hull M; Sommer T
    Trials; 2008 Dec; 9():68. PubMed ID: 19055703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-World Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Conditional Pacemaker System: Results of 4-Year Prospective Follow-Up in 2,629 Patients.
    Williamson BD; Gohn DC; Ramza BM; Singh B; Zhong Y; Li S; Shanahan L;
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Nov; 3(11):1231-1239. PubMed ID: 29759618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical safety of the ProMRI pacemaker system in patients subjected to head and lower lumbar 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanning conditions.
    Bailey WM; Rosenthal L; Fananapazir L; Gleva M; Mazur A; Rinaldi CA; Kypta A; Merkely B; Woodard PK;
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1183-91. PubMed ID: 25680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical safety and performance of a MRI conditional pacing system in patients undergoing cardiac MRI.
    Ching CK; Chakraborty RN; Kler TS; Pumprueg S; Ngarmukos T; Chan JYS; Anand S; Yadav R; Sitthisook S; Yim KW; Jaswal RK; Bhargava K
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 40(12):1389-1395. PubMed ID: 29090491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel MRI-safe dual-chamber pacemaker system: Its time has come.
    Sorrentino RA
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 21044900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter study of the safety and effects of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary sinus left ventricular pacing leads.
    Sheldon SH; Bunch TJ; Cogert GA; Acker NG; Dalzell CM; Higgins JV; Espinosa RE; Asirvatham SJ; Cha YM; Felmlee JP; Watson RE; Anderson JL; Brooks MH; Osborn JS; Friedman PA
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Feb; 12(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 25433144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Qinming8631 DR Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker in Chinese Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of the First Domestically Developed Pacemaker of China.
    Xiang MX; Wang DQ; Xu J; Zhang Z; Hu JX; Wang DM; Gu X; Liu HP; Guo T; Yang XJ; Ling F; Lin JF; Cai SL; Zhu GB; Wang JA
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Nov; 129(22):2659-2665. PubMed ID: 27823996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.
    Lamas GA; Orav EJ; Stambler BS; Ellenbogen KA; Sgarbossa EB; Huang SK; Marinchak RA; Estes NA; Mitchell GF; Lieberman EH; Mangione CM; Goldman L
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1097-104. PubMed ID: 9545357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Santini L; Della Rocca DG; Romano V; Papavasileiou LP; Magliano G; Sgueglia M; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jun; 7(6):750-4. PubMed ID: 20167289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Cohen JD; Costa HS; Russo RJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1631-6. PubMed ID: 22921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients?
    Strach K; Naehle CP; Mühlsteffen A; Hinz M; Bernstein A; Thomas D; Linhart M; Meyer C; Bitaraf S; Schild H; Sommer T
    Europace; 2010 Jul; 12(7):952-60. PubMed ID: 20356915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients.
    Gimbel JR; Bailey SM; Tchou PJ; Ruggieri PM; Wilkoff BL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Oct; 28(10):1041-6. PubMed ID: 16221260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads.
    Higgins JV; Gard JJ; Sheldon SH; Espinosa RE; Wood CP; Felmlee JP; Cha YM; Asirvatham SJ; Dalzell C; Acker N; Watson RE; Friedman PA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 37(10):1284-90. PubMed ID: 24809591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary findings on the safety of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac pacemaker patients.
    van Dijk VF; Delnoy PPHM; Smit JJJ; Ramdat Misier RA; Elvan A; van Es HW; Rensing BJWM; Raciti G; Boersma LVA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 28(7):806-810. PubMed ID: 28429537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.