246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20933119)
1. Acceptability of contraception for men: a review.
Glasier A
Contraception; 2010 Nov; 82(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 20933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status and future perspectives in male contraception.
Costantino A; Cerpolini S; Perrone AM; Ghi T; Pelusi C; Pelusi G; Meriggiola MC
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 17576406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Status of male contraception.
Davis JE
Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1977; 6():355-69. PubMed ID: 337192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Male contraception.
Jensen JT
Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Oct; 2(5):338-45. PubMed ID: 12215306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples.
Marchi NM; de Alvarenga AT; Osis MJ; Bahamondes L
Int Nurs Rev; 2008 Mar; 55(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 18275543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s.
Popov AA; Visser AP; Ketting E
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 8212092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Male hormonal contraception. What prospects exist and how acceptable are they?
Griffin D; Ringheim K
Plan Parent Chall; 1996; (2):20-4. PubMed ID: 12291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Survey of men provides reliable data on contraception in the Dominican Republic].
Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987; (Spec No):38-9. PubMed ID: 12269052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors that determine prevalence of use of contraceptive methods for men.
Ringheim K
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 8511809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Withdrawal: a review of the literature and an agenda for research.
Rogow D; Horowitz S
Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(3):140-53. PubMed ID: 7570764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Male fertility regulation: a study on acceptance among men in Zimbabwe.
Mbizvo MT; Adamchak DJ
Cent Afr J Med; 1992 Feb; 38(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 1505009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraceptive method switching in Peninsular Malaysia: ethnic differences, 1940s-1970s.
Davanzo J; Starbird E; Reboussin D; Tan Boon Ann ; Abdullah SH
Malays J Reprod Health; 1988 Jun; 6(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 12281591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Advantages and disadvantages of each contraceptive method].
Leridon H
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Nov; 14(11):1007-11. PubMed ID: 12269087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New methods could test male responsibility.
Ringheim K
Entre Nous Cph Den; 1991 Dec; (19):5. PubMed ID: 12222222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Male involvement and contraceptive methods for men: present and future.
Ringheim K
Soc Change; 1996; 26(3-4):88-99. PubMed ID: 12348919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fertility regulation technology: status and prospects.
Segal SJ; Nordberg OS
Popul Bull; 1977 Mar; 31(6):1-25. PubMed ID: 12335682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence based contraceptive choices.
Scott A; Glasier A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):665-80. PubMed ID: 16707277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Men and family planning--a global view.
Concern (Anaheim); 1981; (20):1-2. PubMed ID: 12338296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attenders at young people's clinics in Southampton: variations in contraceptive use.
Coleman L; Ingham R
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Oct; 24(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 9855715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contraceptive method mix menu: providing healthy choices for women.
Greenwell KF
World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 9050186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
