These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20933394)

  • 21. Relation between the stability of activated sludge flocs and membrane fouling in MBR: under different SRTs.
    Tian Y; Su X
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 118():477-82. PubMed ID: 22717566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphor removal in an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wang ZW; Wu ZC; Gu GW; Yu GP; Ma LM
    J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 17294637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wang Z; Wu Z; Tang S
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2504-12. PubMed ID: 19285331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Indigenous somatic coliphage removal from a real municipal wastewater by a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wu J; Li H; Huang X
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1853-62. PubMed ID: 20045169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of membrane bioreactor configurations on sludge structure and microbial activity.
    Clouzot L; Roche N; Marrot B
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):975-81. PubMed ID: 20947340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomass characteristics and membrane aeration: toward a better understanding of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
    Germain E; Stephenson T; Pearce P
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15800864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of sludge retention time on MBR fouling: role of extracellular polymeric substances determined through membrane autopsy.
    Silva AF; Antunes S; Freitas F; Carvalho G; Reis MAM; Barreto Crespo MT
    Biofouling; 2017 Aug; 33(7):556-566. PubMed ID: 28675051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
    Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occurrence, source, and fate of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor.
    Meng F; Drews A; Mehrez R; Iversen V; Ernst M; Yang F; Jekel M; Kraume M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(23):8821-6. PubMed ID: 19943652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Occurrence of EPS in activated sludge from a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Evenblij H; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):293-300. PubMed ID: 15686034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors.
    Zhang J; Zhou J; Liu Y; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5407-13. PubMed ID: 20684971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and bacterial communities in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled with online ultrasound equipment.
    Yu Z; Wen X; Xu M; Huang X
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 117():333-40. PubMed ID: 22621809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contribution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their subfractions to the sludge aggregation in membrane bioreactor coupled with worm reactor.
    Li Z; Tian Y; Ding Y; Wang H; Chen L
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():328-36. PubMed ID: 23891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of sludge discharge on sludge settleability and membrane flux in a membrane bioreactor.
    Li XF; Zhang LN; Du GC
    Environ Technol; 2010 Oct; 31(11):1289-94. PubMed ID: 21046959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of carriers on sludge characteristics and mitigation of membrane fouling in attached-growth membrane bioreactor.
    Hu J; Ren H; Xu K; Geng J; Ding L; Yan X; Li K
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 122():35-41. PubMed ID: 22704185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Judd S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):27-34. PubMed ID: 16003958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.