These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20933477)

  • 1. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry.
    Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation.
    Hui S; Yi L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Aramberri J; Huang J; Barboni P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct; 33(10):690-695. PubMed ID: 28991337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation.
    Rodriguez-Raton A; Jimenez-Alvarez M; Arteche-Limousin L; Mediavilla-Peña E; Larrucea-Martinez I
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25655597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
    Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.
    Rabsilber TM; Jepsen C; Auffarth GU; Holzer MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 20152602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Németh J; Fekete O; Pesztenlehrer N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jan; 29(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 12551672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Pentacam equivalent keratometry reading and IOL Master keratometry measurement in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Karunaratne N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 41(9):825-34. PubMed ID: 23601493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.