These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20933588)

  • 1. Can we use verbal estimation to dissect the internal clock? Differentiating the effects of pacemaker rate, switch latencies, and judgment processes.
    Matthews WJ
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20933588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration.
    Matthews WJ; Stewart N; Wearden JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):303-13. PubMed ID: 20731508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans.
    Wearden JH; Edwards H; Fakhri M; Percival A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 May; 51(2):97-120. PubMed ID: 9621837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task switching and subjective duration.
    Wearden JH; O'Rourke SC; Matchwick C; Min Z; Maeers S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):531-43. PubMed ID: 19591078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time estimation of fear cues in human observers.
    Grommet EK; Droit-Volet S; Gil S; Hemmes NS; Baker AH; Brown BL
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 20971168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of Parkinson's disease on time estimation as a function of stimulus duration range and modality.
    Smith JG; Harper DN; Gittings D; Abernethy D
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Jul; 64(2):130-43. PubMed ID: 17343966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality and intermittency effects on time estimation.
    Ortega L; Lopez F; Church RM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 19429221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?
    Wearden JH; Todd NP; Jones LA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1709-24. PubMed ID: 16945856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How emotional auditory stimuli modulate time perception.
    Noulhiane M; Mella N; Samson S; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 18039036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion.
    Wearden JH; Norton R; Martin S; Montford-Bebb O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):716-29. PubMed ID: 17563232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1591-600. PubMed ID: 20675803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closer in time when farther in space--spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration.
    Noesselt T; Fendrich R; Bonath B; Tyll S; Heinze HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):443-58. PubMed ID: 16129586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Schröger E
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 15955422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interaction between duration, velocity and repetitive auditory stimulation.
    Makin AD; Poliakoff E; Dillon J; Perrin A; Mullet T; Jones LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 22370503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deficits in temporal-order judgments in dyslexia: evidence from diotic stimuli differing spectrally and from dichotic stimuli differing only by perceived location.
    Ben-Artzi E; Fostick L; Babkoff H
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):714-23. PubMed ID: 15721184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vibrotactile timing: Are vibrotactile judgements of duration affected by repetitive stimulation?
    Jones LA; Ogden RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 25965268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceiving numbers alters time perception.
    Oliveri M; Vicario CM; Salerno S; Koch G; Turriziani P; Mangano R; Chillemi G; Caltagirone C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 18486340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action, arousal, and subjective time.
    Yarrow K; Haggard P; Rothwell JC
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Jun; 13(2):373-90. PubMed ID: 15134766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2015 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25758710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.