249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20934291)
1. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors.
Wenzel A; Hirsch E; Christensen J; Matzen LH; Scaf G; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):39458105. PubMed ID: 22842638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
Wenzel A; Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
