BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20934669)

  • 1. Crossover from radial to femoral access during a challenging percutaneous coronary intervention can make the difference between success and failure.
    Cooper L; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(4):266.e5-8. PubMed ID: 20934669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a guide catheter extension system as an aid during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary artery bypass grafts.
    Farooq V; Mamas MA; Fath-Ordoubadi F; Fraser DG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(6):847-63. PubMed ID: 21234926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay.
    Bundhoo SS; Earp E; Ivanauskiene T; Kunadian V; Freeman P; Edwards R; Kinnaird TD; Zaman A; Anderson RA
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23067903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after percutaneous recanalization of chronic total saphenous vein graft occlusion using modern techniques.
    Al-Lamee R; Ielasi A; Latib A; Godino C; Ferraro M; Arioli F; Mussardo M; Piraino D; Figini F; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Chieffo A; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec; 106(12):1721-7. PubMed ID: 21126616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tirofiban administration and percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting of saphenous vein graft thrombosis.
    D'andrea C; Esposito G; Piscione F; Chiariello M
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Nov; 10(11):875-8. PubMed ID: 19644385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous saphenous vein graft intervention with sequential embolic protection devices: complementing lesion anatomy with embolic protection device.
    Grow P; Rab ST
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 18942125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the Proxis embolic protection device for guide anchoring and stent delivery during complex saphenous vein graft interventions.
    Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2009; 10(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 19595401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study.
    Ziakas A; Klinke P; Mildenberger R; Fretz E; Williams M; Della Siega A; Kinloch D; Hilton D
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16093218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlates of adverse events during saphenous vein graft intervention with distal embolic protection: a PRIDE substudy.
    Kirtane AJ; Heyman ER; Metzger C; Breall JA; Carrozza JP
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 19463299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distal embolization after net protective stent (MGUARD) implantation in a degenerated saphenous vein graft lesion.
    Yassin I; Thuesen L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):639-41. PubMed ID: 20091812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and predictors of drug-eluting stent use in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: a report from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI registry.
    Brilakis ES; Wang TY; Rao SV; Banerjee S; Goldman S; Shunk K; Kar B; Holmes DR; Dai D; Chin CT; Harding TM; Roe MT
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1068-73. PubMed ID: 20965466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
    Pandie S; Mehta SR; Cantor WJ; Cheema AN; Gao P; Madan M; Niemela K; Rao SV; Schwalm JD; Valentin V; Velianou JL; Jolly SS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D reconstruction from contrast coronary angiography in magnetic percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Patterson M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):532-5. PubMed ID: 20882658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radial versus femoral approach for saphenous vein grafts angiography and interventions.
    Israeli Z; Lavi S; Pancholy SB; Nombela-Franco L; Gilchrist IC; Gilchrist IC; Aldazabal A; Sharabi-Nov A; Levi Y; Hayman S; Tzemos N; Ayán D; Mamas MA; Bagur R
    Am Heart J; 2019 Apr; 210():1-8. PubMed ID: 30711875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial stent deformation in saphenous vein graft.
    Sachdeva R; Aleti S; Thai H
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):876-7. PubMed ID: 23171807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early experience with a new approach for percutaneous intervention of totally occluded saphenous vein graft: is the flow the best thrombolytic?
    Fiorina C; Meliga E; Chizzola G; Curello S; Tayeh O; Vizzardi E; Dei Cas L; Ettori F
    EuroIntervention; 2010 Sep; 6(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 20884433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrograde recanalization of native coronary artery chronic occlusions via acutely occluded vein grafts.
    Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Lombardi WL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 75(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 19670306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical presentation and angiographic characteristics of saphenous vein graft failure after stenting: insights from the SOS (stenting of saphenous vein grafts) trial.
    Lichtenwalter C; de Lemos JA; Roesle M; Obel O; Holper EM; Haagen D; Saeed B; Iturbe JM; Shunk K; Bissett JK; Sachdeva R; Voudris VV; Karyofillis P; Kar B; Rossen J; Fasseas P; Berger P; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Sep; 2(9):855-60. PubMed ID: 19778774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians.
    Jaffe R; Hong T; Sharieff W; Chisholm RJ; Kutryk MJ; Charron T; Cheema AN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 May; 69(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 17191214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Rathore S; Hakeem A; Pauriah M; Roberts E; Beaumont A; Morris JL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 73(7):883-7. PubMed ID: 19455660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.