These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20934744)

  • 1. Influence of material selection on the risk of inlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Schlichting LH
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
    Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning.
    Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
    Mehl C; Ludwig K; Steiner M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 19836829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of onlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping.
    Magne P; Schlichting LH; Paranhos MP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):942-7. PubMed ID: 21722950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
    Puschmann D; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 19583761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
    Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.