BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20934792)

  • 1. Influence of cementing the pin on resistance to fracture in hip resurfacing.
    Schlegel UJ; Siewe J; Bitsch RG; Koebke J; Eysel P; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Feb; 26(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20934792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative in vitro study on the long-term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs.
    Paul JP
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):395; author reply 395-6. PubMed ID: 16263127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty.
    Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of peri- and interprosthetic fractures of the femur.
    Lehmann W; Rupprecht M; Hellmers N; Sellenschloh K; Briem D; Püschel K; Amling M; Morlock M; Rueger JM
    J Trauma; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1459-63. PubMed ID: 20093986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.
    Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
    Instr Course Lect; 1998; 47():243-9. PubMed ID: 9571425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
    Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrograde bridging nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Zuurmond RG; Pilot P; Verburg AD
    Injury; 2007 Aug; 38(8):958-64. PubMed ID: 17306269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture of the femoral alignment stem of a hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A case report.
    Bhutta MA; Shah VB
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Feb; 77(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 21473460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips.
    Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.
    Amanatullah DF; Cheung Y; Di Cesare PE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20399365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended osteotomy for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Jan; 35(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16475419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. What do we know?].
    Bitsch RG; Schmalzried TP
    Orthopade; 2008 Jul; 37(7):667-71. PubMed ID: 18584150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Grigoris P; Roberts P; Panousis K; Bosch H
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):125-34, vii. PubMed ID: 15833450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Therapeutic proposals by lesion stage: evaluation and perspectives].
    Migaud H; Courpied JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():86-9. PubMed ID: 11084501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pre-and peroperative femoral fractures].
    Mertl P; de Lestang M; Havet E; Roux O; Vives P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():66-8. PubMed ID: 11084494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.