BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20935075)

  • 21. Canada's efforts in developing capabilities in radiological population monitoring.
    Li C; Wilkins R; Dai X; Sadi B; Ko R; Kramer GH
    Health Phys; 2011 Aug; 101(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 21709496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low dose ionizing radiation exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality: cohort study based on Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers.
    Zielinski JM; Ashmore PJ; Band PR; Jiang H; Shilnikova NS; Tait VK; Krewski D
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2009; 22(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 19329385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Would children be adequately protected by existing intervention levels during a radionuclear emergency?
    Tracy BL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20729540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy.
    Brent RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 19121655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence of children's vulnerability to radiation in the context of radiological/nuclear events and considerations for emergency response.
    Lane R; Reinhardt P; Thompson P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 20959331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding and characterisation of the risks to human health from exposure to low levels of radiation.
    Goodhead DT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Nov; 137(1-2):109-17. PubMed ID: 19778936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Some considerations for mass casualty management in radiation emergencies.
    Hopmeier M; Abrahams J; Carr Z
    Health Phys; 2010 Jun; 98(6):790-4. PubMed ID: 20445382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents.
    Miller SM; Ferrarotto CL; Vlahovich S; Wilkins RC; Boreham DR; Dolling JA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2007 Jul; 83(7):471-7. PubMed ID: 17538797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Doses to children from intakes by ingestion.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 20729541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative comparisons of cancer induction in humans by internally deposited radionuclides and external radiation.
    Harrison JD; Muirhead CR
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12556326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Medical preparedness for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) events: gaps and recommendations.
    Wilkinson D; Waruszynski B; Mazurik L; Szymczak AM; Redmond E; Lichacz F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 21041238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo EPR dosimetry to quantify exposures to clinically significant doses of ionising radiation.
    Swartz HM; Iwasaki A; Walczak T; Demidenko E; Salikhov I; Khan N; Lesniewski P; Thomas J; Romanyukha A; Schauer D; Starewicz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):163-70. PubMed ID: 16644994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Non-cancer EMF effects related to children.
    Feychting M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S69-74. PubMed ID: 16142774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Suspected radioactive contamination: evaluation of 45 Israeli citizens potentially exposed to polonium-210 in London.
    Brosh-Nissimov T; Havkin O; Davidovitch N; Poles L; Shapira C
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Feb; 10(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 18432019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures.
    Brent RL
    Teratology; 1999 Apr; 59(4):182-204. PubMed ID: 10331519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.