These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20936917)

  • 1. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method.
    Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of clinically relevant factors on the immediate biomechanical surrounding for a series of dental implant designs.
    Shunmugasamy VC; Gupta N; Pessoa RS; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031005. PubMed ID: 21303181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
    Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.