These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20936950)

  • 21. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study.
    Schulze RK; Gloede MB; Doll GM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 12490875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
    Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls.
    Tng TT; Chan TC; Hägg U; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 8005198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Craniofacial features of patients with sickle cell anemia and sickle cell trait.
    Pithon MM; Palmeira LM; Barbosa AA; Pereira R; de Andrade AC; Coqueiro Rda S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):825-9. PubMed ID: 24592905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography.
    Hilgers ML; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 16360924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment and comparison of cranial base morphology in individuals with long face and short face.
    Rai S; Saidath K; Mathew KA; Shetty SS
    J Orthod Sci; 2023; 12():30. PubMed ID: 37351403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry.
    Hsiao TH; Chang HP; Liu KM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 9107378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparisons of chewing rhythm, craniomandibular morphology, body mass and height between mothers and their biological daughters.
    Cho C; Louie K; Maawadh A; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(11):1667-74. PubMed ID: 26363460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
    Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow J; Soares Cevidanes LH; Mol A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 18298214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.
    Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Frazäo DC; McNamara JA; Manzi FR
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 20936951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.