185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20936953)
1. Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction.
Küçükkeleş N; Nevzatoğlu S; Koldaş T
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 20936953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of surgically-assisted maxillary protraction.
Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24968642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sagittal airway changes: rapid palatal expansion versus Le Fort I osteotomy during maxillary protraction.
Cakirer B; Kucukkeles N; Nevzatoglu S; Koldas T
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 21464152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction. By Nazan Küçükkeleş, Şirin Nevzatoğlu, and Tamer Koldaş. Angle Orthod. 2011:81;44-51.
Yethadka MK; Shetty SK
Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):357. PubMed ID: 21319983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.
Halicioglu K; Yavuz I; Ceylan I; Erdem A
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
Hino CT; Cevidanes LH; Nguyen TT; De Clerck HJ; Franchi L; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthopaedic treatment efficiency in skeletal Class III malocclusions in young patients: RME-face mask versus TSME.
Maspero C; Galbiati G; Perillo L; Favero L; Giannini L
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Sep; 13(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22971261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics.
Yilmaz HN; Garip H; Satilmis T; Kucukkeles N
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 24913740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary corticotomy and extraoral orthopedic traction in mature teenage patients: a case report.
Pelo S; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Longobardi G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):76-84. PubMed ID: 17618333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.
Cevidanes L; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; De Clerck H
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 20578848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis.
Zhang W; Qu HC; Yu M; Zhang Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130096. PubMed ID: 26068221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment.
Pamporakis P; Nevzatoğlu Ş; Küçükkeleş N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 24417494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of treatment effects of different maxillary protraction methods in skeletal class III patients.
Buyukcavus MH; Kale B; Aydemir B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Nov; 23(4):445-454. PubMed ID: 32406170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective long-term comparison of early RME-facemask versus late Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC and miniscrew-supported intraoral elastics in growing Class III patients.
Papadopoulou AK; Koletsi D; Masucci C; Giuntini V; Franchi L; Darendeliler MA
Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100603. PubMed ID: 34972642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the short-term effects of different maxillary protraction methods on pharyngeal airway dimensions.
Kale B; Buyukcavus MH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Nov; 24(4):543-552. PubMed ID: 33506632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
