These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20936995)

  • 41. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ; Olsen SØ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Ibertsson T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Influence of Speech Rate on Acceptable Noise Levels.
    Tiffin S; Gordon-Hickey S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):596-608. PubMed ID: 29988008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of Acceptable Noise Level Generated Using Different Transducers and Response Modes.
    Xia L; He J; Sun Y; Chen Y; Luo Q; Shi H; Feng Y; Yin S
    Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():3786489. PubMed ID: 30046301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users.
    Kim JH; Lee JH; Lee HK
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 7(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 24917904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech recognition and listening effort for older adults.
    Kwak C; Han W; Lee J; Kim J; Kim S
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2018 Dec; 18(12):1603-1608. PubMed ID: 30328231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Test-retest reliability of Mandarin acceptable noise level].
    Wu D; Zhang H; Chen J; Wang S; Chen J; Wu Y; Li Y; Ren D
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(7):352-4, 358. PubMed ID: 23833986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Audiovisual speech in older and younger adults: integrating a distorted visual signal with speech in noise.
    Gordon MS; Allen S
    Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(2):202-19. PubMed ID: 19280447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise.
    Rogers DS; Harkrider AW; Burchfield SB; Nabelek AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):372-82; quiz 401. PubMed ID: 14620611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Role of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex in Acceptable Noise Level in Adults.
    Jamos AM; Hosier B; Davis S; Franklin TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):137-143. PubMed ID: 34062604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Relationship between loudness tolerance and the acceptance of background noise for young adults with normal hearing.
    Franklin CA; White LJ; Franklin TC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Jun; 114(3):717-22. PubMed ID: 22913014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Impact of Transducer Selection on the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Bryan MF; Davis S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 35577056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Dagenais PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 3760327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.
    Koch X; Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A; Janse E
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():186. PubMed ID: 26952145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural Mechanisms of the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Miller SE; Anderson C; Montou O; Lam BPW; Schafer E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):765-774. PubMed ID: 36724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.