These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938187)

  • 1. Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
    Hanschmann H; Lohmann A; Berger R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 20938187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between subjective self-rating and objective voice assessment measures.
    Aboras Y; El-Banna M; El-Magraby R; Ibrahim A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2010 Apr; 35(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 20350074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures.
    Murry T; Medrado R; Hogikyan ND; Aviv JE
    J Voice; 2004 Jun; 18(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 15193651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of antituberculosis treatment on self assessment, perceptual analysis and acoustic analysis of voice quality in laryngeal tuberculosis patients.
    Yelken K; Guven M; Topak M; Gultekin E; Turan F
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Apr; 122(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 17592656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The voice handicap index: correlation between subjective patient response and quantitative assessment of voice.
    Woisard V; Bodin S; Yardeni E; Puech M
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):623-31. PubMed ID: 16887329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study on self-assessment, acoustic analysis, laryngoscopy for patients with voice surgery].
    Yu Z; Pang Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 24(21):980-2, 986. PubMed ID: 21261018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity.
    Hakkesteegt MM; Brocaar MP; Wieringa MH; Feenstra L
    J Voice; 2008 Mar; 22(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 17570633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
    van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Voice disorders in female teachers assessed by Voice Handicap Index].
    Niebudek-Bogusz E; Kuzańska A; Woźnicka E; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2007; 58(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 18274090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voice after supracricoid laryngectomy: subjective, objective and self-assessment data.
    Schindler A; Favero E; Nudo S; Spadola-Bisetti M; Ottaviani F; Schindler O
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):114-9. PubMed ID: 16287650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiparameter voice assessment for voice disorder patients: a correlation analysis between objective and subjective parameters.
    Ziwei Y; Zheng P; Pin D
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 24972535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.
    Awan SN; Roy N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 16393797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.