179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938228)
21. Role of dicentric analysis in an overarching biodosimetry strategy for use following a nuclear detonation in an urban environment.
Blumenthal DJ; Sugarman SL; Christensen DM; Wiley AL; Livingston GK; Glassman ES; Koerner JF; Sullivan JM; Hinds S
Health Phys; 2014 Apr; 106(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 24562072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combined approach of hematological biomarkers and plasma protein SAA for improvement of radiation dose assessment triage in biodosimetry applications.
Ossetrova NI; Sandgren DJ; Gallego S; Blakely WF
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 20065684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cytogenetic biodosimetry of an accidental exposure of a radiological worker using multiple assays.
Thierens H; De Ruyck K; Vral A; de Gelder V; Whitehouse CA; Tawn EJ; Boesman I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 15797919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biodosimetric tools for a fast triage of people accidentally exposed to ionising radiation. Statistical and computational aspects.
Ainsbury EA; Barquinero JF
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2009; 45(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 19861736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple parameter radiation injury assessment using a nonhuman primate radiation model-biodosimetry applications.
Blakely WF; Ossetrova NI; Whitnall MH; Sandgren DJ; Krivokrysenko VI; Shakhov A; Feinstein E
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 20065677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in luxembourg between 1994 and 2002.
Shannoun F; Zeeb H; Back C; Blettner M
Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16832196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biodosimety Assessment Tool: a post-exposure software application for management of radiation accidents.
Sine RC; Levine IH; Jackson WE; Hawley AL; Prasanna PG; Grace MB; Goans RE; Greenhill RG; Blakely WF
Mil Med; 2001 Dec; 166(12 Suppl):85-7. PubMed ID: 11778449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. General guidelines for safe and expeditious international transport of samples subjected to biological dosimetry assessment.
Di Giorgio M; Radl A; Taja MR; Bubniak R; Deminge M; Sapienza C; Vázquez M; Baciu F; Kenny P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jun; 159(1-4):3-9. PubMed ID: 24743754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rapid radiation dose assessment for radiological public health emergencies: roles of NIAID and BARDA.
Grace MB; Moyer BR; Prasher J; Cliffer KD; Ramakrishnan N; Kaminski J; Coleman CN; Manning RG; Maidment BW; Hatchett R
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 20065680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation biodosimetry: applications for spaceflight.
Blakely WF; Miller AC; Grace MB; McLeland CB; Luo L; Muderhwa JM; Miner VL; Prasanna PG
Adv Space Res; 2003; 31(6):1487-93. PubMed ID: 12971403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Environmental biodosimetry: a biologically relevant tool for ecological risk assessment and biomonitoring.
Ulsh B; Hinton TG; Congdon JD; Dugan LC; Whicker FW; Bedford JS
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):121-39. PubMed ID: 12590073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiation monitoring strategy: factors to be considered.
Lahtinen J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):79-82. PubMed ID: 15238661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Early identification of radiation accident victims for therapy of bone marrow failure.
Dainiak N; Sorba S
Stem Cells; 1997; 15 Suppl 2():275-85. PubMed ID: 9368314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cytogenetic methods for biodosimetry and risk individualisation after exposure to ionising radiation.
Terzoudi GI; Pantelias GE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 17169946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Airborne gamma spectrometry--towards integration of European operational capability.
Toivonen H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):137-40. PubMed ID: 15238672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. International intercomparison for criticality dosimetry: the case of biological dosimetry.
Roy L; Buard V; Delbos M; Durand V; Paillole N; Grégoire E; Voisin P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):471-6. PubMed ID: 15353693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The ENEA criticality accident dosimetry system: a contribution to the 2002 international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor.
Gualdrini G; Bedogni R; Fantuzzi E; Mariotti F;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15353692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry.
Ainsbury EA; Lloyd DC
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 20065696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Methodology and tools for source term assessment in case of emergency.
Herviou K; Calmtorp C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 15238656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of low level radiation-what's new?
Royal HD
Semin Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 38(5):392-402. PubMed ID: 18662560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
