180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938228)
41. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.
Sasaki MS
Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Feb; 79(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 12569012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Better use of European (regional) resources.
Rojas-Palma C; Hardeman F; Miska H; Duranova T; Cabanekova H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):115-7. PubMed ID: 15238668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. BIODOSIMETRY AND BIODOSIMETRY NETWORKS FOR MANAGING RADIATION EMERGENCY.
Kulka U; Wojcik A; Di Giorgio M; Wilkins R; Suto Y; Jang S; Quing-Jie L; Jiaxiang L; Ainsbury E; Woda C; Roy L; Li C; Lloyd D; Carr Z
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 30423161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intercomparison on the usage of computational codes in radiation dosimetry.
Tanner RJ; Chartier JL; Siebert BR; Agosteo S; Grosswendt B; Gualdrini G; Kodeli I; Leuthold GP; Ménard S; Price RA; Tagziria H; Terrissol M; Zankl M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):769-80. PubMed ID: 15353746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Why can't we find a better biological indicator of dose?
Voisin P; Roy L; Benderitter M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15623880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. International exchange of emergency phase information and assessments: an aid to national/international decision makers.
Sullivan TJ; Chino M; Ehrhardt J; Shershakov V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15238671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Is there a need for hydrological modelling in decision support systems for nuclear emergencies.
Raskob W; Heling R; Zheleznyak M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 15238667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Triage, monitoring and dose assessment for people exposed to ionising radiation following a malevolent act.
Etherington G; Rothkamm K; Shutt AL; Youngman MJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):534-9. PubMed ID: 21147786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The Austria-Czech Republic co-operation in the field of radiation-emergency preparedness.
Prouza Z; Drabova D; Moltasova J; Hohenberg JK; Hofer P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):105-10. PubMed ID: 15238666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of cytogenetic indicators in radiobiology.
Rodrigues AS; Oliveira NG; Gil OM; Léonard A; Rueff J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):455-60. PubMed ID: 16381766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Chernobyl experience: biological indicators of exposure to ionizing radiation.
Baranov AE; Guskova AK; Nadejina NM; Nugis VYu
Stem Cells; 1995 May; 13 Suppl 1():69-77. PubMed ID: 7488970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cytogenetic research after accidental radiation exposure.
Bauchinger M
Stem Cells; 1995 May; 13 Suppl 1():182-90. PubMed ID: 7488944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents.
Miller SM; Ferrarotto CL; Vlahovich S; Wilkins RC; Boreham DR; Dolling JA
Int J Radiat Biol; 2007 Jul; 83(7):471-7. PubMed ID: 17538797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry.
Vinnikov VA; Ainsbury EA; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
Radiat Res; 2010 Oct; 174(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 20726714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Biodosimetry for high dose accidental exposures by drug induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay.
Balakrishnan S; Shirsath K; Bhat N; Anjaria K
Mutat Res; 2010 Jun; 699(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 20338261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accurate dose assessment system for an exposed person utilising radiation transport calculation codes in emergency response to a radiological accident.
Takahashi F; Shigemori Y; Seki A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jan; 133(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 19181661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Protection of the public in situations of prolonged radiation exposure. The application of the Commission's system of radiological protection to controllable radiation exposure due to natural sources and long-lived radioactive residues.
Ann ICRP; 1999; 29(1-2):1-109. PubMed ID: 10962071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Celebrating 60 Years of Accomplishments of the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute1.
Bene BJ; Blakely WF; Burmeister DM; Cary L; Chhetri SJ; Davis CM; Ghosh SP; Holmes-Hampton GP; Iordanskiy S; Kalinich JF; Kiang JG; Kumar VP; Lowy RJ; Miller A; Naeem M; Schauer DA; Senchak L; Singh VK; Stewart AJ; Velazquez EM; Xiao M
Radiat Res; 2021 Aug; 196(2):129-146. PubMed ID: 33979439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biodosimetry: A Future Tool for Medical Management of Radiological Emergencies.
Sproull MT; Camphausen KA; Koblentz GD
Health Secur; 2017; 15(6):599-610. PubMed ID: 29193982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
