BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938341)

  • 1. Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.
    Wiktor DM; Sawlani N; Kanthi Y; Sipahi I; Fang JC; Blitz A
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 20938341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: successful combined use of the Impella Recover 2.5 device and intraaortic balloon pump support for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.
    El Oakley R
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):517-8. PubMed ID: 21245797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined use of Impella device and intra-aortic balloon pump to improve survival in a patient in profound cardiogenic shock post cardiac arrest.
    Gupta A; Allaqaband S; Bajwa T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 74(6):975-6. PubMed ID: 19521993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical versus pharmacologic support for cardiogenic shock.
    Dhar G; Jolly N
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 75(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 20049971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Thiele H; Sick P; Boudriot E; Diederich KW; Hambrecht R; Niebauer J; Schuler G
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jul; 26(13):1276-83. PubMed ID: 15734771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous.
    Schampaert S; van't Veer M; van de Vosse FN; Pijls NH; de Mol BA; Rutten MC
    Artif Organs; 2011 Sep; 35(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 21819436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump for management of refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Pavlidis AN; Redwood SR; Clapp BR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):E50-1. PubMed ID: 24791724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the Impella 2.5 system alone, after and in combination with an intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock: case description and review of the literature.
    Cubeddu RJ; Lago R; Horvath SA; Vignola PA; O'Neill W; Palacios IF
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Apr; 7(12):1453-60. PubMed ID: 22522555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: an experimental study.
    Sauren LD; Accord RE; Hamzeh K; de Jong M; van der Nagel T; van der Veen FH; Maessen JG
    Artif Organs; 2007 Nov; 31(11):839-42. PubMed ID: 18001394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience.
    Engström AE; Cocchieri R; Driessen AH; Sjauw KD; Vis MM; Baan J; de Jong M; Lagrand WK; van der Sloot JA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; de Mol BA; Piek JJ; Henriques JP
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Sep; 39(9):2072-9. PubMed ID: 21602670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Impella system for mechanical support and myocardial recovery].
    Engström AE; de Mol BA; Lagrand WK; Henriques JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154(45):A2699. PubMed ID: 21118589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Circulatory assist devices in cardiology].
    Ferrari M; Figulla HR
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Mar; 130(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 15776348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: role of mechanical circulatory support.
    Aggarwal S; Slaughter MS
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2008 Oct; 6(9):1223-35. PubMed ID: 18939910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Windecker S
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2007 Oct; 13(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 17762230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The successful combined use of Impella LP 2.5 and intra-aortic balloon pump in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Romeo F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2012 Aug; 13(8):531-2. PubMed ID: 22767014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial report of percutaneous right ventricular assist for right ventricular shock secondary to right ventricular infarction.
    Giesler GM; Gomez JS; Letsou G; Vooletich M; Smalling RW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Aug; 68(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 16819772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.
    Burkhoff D; Cohen H; Brunckhorst C; O'Neill WW;
    Am Heart J; 2006 Sep; 152(3):469.e1-8. PubMed ID: 16923414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.