254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938721)
1. Comparison between clinical significance of serum proinflammatory proteins (IL-6 and CRP) and classic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19-9) in gastric cancer.
Lukaszewicz-Zając M; Mroczko B; Gryko M; Kędra B; Szmitkowski M
Clin Exp Med; 2011 Jun; 11(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 20938721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serum interleukin-6 and -10 levels in patients with gastric cancer.
Ikeguchi M; Hatada T; Yamamoto M; Miyake T; Matsunaga T; Fukumoto Y; Yamada Y; Fukuda K; Saito H; Tatebe S
Gastric Cancer; 2009; 12(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 19562463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher importance of interleukin 6 than classic tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and squamous cell cancer antigen) in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer patients.
Łukaszewicz-Zając M; Mroczko B; Kozłowski M; Nikliński J; Laudański J; Szmitkowski M
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Apr; 25(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 21895853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein level in colorectal cancer.
Kwon KA; Kim SH; Oh SY; Lee S; Han JY; Kim KH; Goh RY; Choi HJ; Park KJ; Roh MS; Kim HJ; Kwon HC; Lee JH
BMC Cancer; 2010 May; 10():203. PubMed ID: 20465852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serum chemokine CXCL8 as a better biomarker for diagnosis and prediction of pancreatic cancer than its specific receptor CXCR2, C-reactive protein, and classic tumor markers CA 19-9 and CEA.
Litman-Zawadzka A; Łukaszewicz-Zając M; Gryko M; Kulczyńska-Przybik A; Mroczko B
Pol Arch Intern Med; 2018 Sep; 128(9):524-531. PubMed ID: 30057378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic usefulness of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the differentiation between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.
Mroczko B; Groblewska M; Gryko M; Kedra B; Szmitkowski M
J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 20626020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer.
Liang Y; Wang W; Fang C; Raj SS; Hu WM; Li QW; Zhou ZW
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(31):49565-49573. PubMed ID: 27385101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.
Jiexian J; Xiaoqin X; Lili D; Baoguo T; Ting S; Xianwen Z; Cunzhi H
Int J Biol Markers; 2013 Jun; 28(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23787496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cell factor (SCF) and interleukin 3 (IL-3) in the sera of patients with colorectal cancer.
Mroczko B; Szmitkowski M; Wereszczyńska-Siemiatkowska U; Okulczyk B
Dig Dis Sci; 2005 Jun; 50(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 15986847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.
Yin LK; Sun XQ; Mou DZ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3867-70. PubMed ID: 25987051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined detection of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the diagnosis and prognosis of resectable gastric cancer.
Tian SB; Yu JC; Kang WM; Ma ZQ; Ye X; Cao ZJ; Yan C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(15):6295-300. PubMed ID: 25124614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Yang AP; Liu J; Lei HY; Zhang QW; Zhao L; Yang GH
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Nov; 437():183-6. PubMed ID: 25086284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined use of AFP, CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.
He CZ; Zhang KH; Li Q; Liu XH; Hong Y; Lv NH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 May; 13():87. PubMed ID: 23672279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.
Ychou M; Duffour J; Kramar A; Gourgou S; Grenier J
Dis Markers; 2000; 16(3-4):105-10. PubMed ID: 11381189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined preoperative concentrations of CEA, CA 19-9, and 72-4 for predicting outcomes in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection.
Liu X; Qiu H; Liu J; Chen S; Xu D; Li W; Zhan Y; Li Y; Chen Y; Zhou Z; Sun X
Oncotarget; 2016 Jun; 7(23):35446-53. PubMed ID: 27147574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prognostic value of CA 19-9 but not of CEA in patients with gastric cancer.
Victorzon M; Haglund C; Lundin J; Roberts PJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1995 Aug; 21(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 7664902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9 and CA72.4 in patients with gastric cancer.
Tocchi A; Costa G; Lepre L; Liotta G; Mazzoni G; Cianetti A; Vannini P
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1998; 124(8):450-5. PubMed ID: 9750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumor markers for diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.
Jing JX; Wang Y; Xu XQ; Sun T; Tian BG; Du LL; Zhao XW; Han CZ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(23):10267-72. PubMed ID: 25556459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric cancer.
Fernández-Fernández L; Tejero E; Tieso A; Rabadán L; Munoz M; Santos I
Int Surg; 1996; 81(4):400-2. PubMed ID: 9127805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hematopoietic cytokines in the sera of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Mroczko B; Szmitkowski M; Wereszczyńska-Siemiatkowska U; Jurkowska G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 15843207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
