These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20938766)
1. The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle. Greendale GA; Nili NS; Huang MH; Seeger L; Karlamangla AS Osteoporos Int; 2011 Jun; 22(6):1897-905. PubMed ID: 20938766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thoracic kyphosis assessment in postmenopausal women: an examination of the Flexicurve method in comparison to radiological methods. Spencer L; Fary R; McKenna L; Ho R; Briffa K Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2009-2018. PubMed ID: 31230111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the manual inclinometer and flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis. Barrett E; Lenehan B; O'sullivan K; Lewis J; McCreesh K Physiother Theory Pract; 2018 Apr; 34(4):301-308. PubMed ID: 29111847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlations among four measures of thoracic kyphosis in older adults. Tran TH; Wing D; Davis A; Bergstrom J; Schousboe JT; Nichols JF; Kado DM Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1255-1259. PubMed ID: 26475287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The validity and reliability of noninvasive methods for measuring kyphosis. Azadinia F; Kamyab M; Behtash H; Saleh Ganjavian M; Javaheri MR J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):E212-8. PubMed ID: 23732184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing a supine radiologic versus standing clinical measurement of kyphosis in older women: the Fracture Intervention Trial. Kado DM; Christianson L; Palermo L; Smith-Bindman R; Cummings SR; Greendale GA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 16481959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of the measurement of thoracolumbar burst fracture kyphosis with Cobb angle, Gardner angle, and sagittal index. Jiang SD; Wu QZ; Lan SH; Dai LY Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Feb; 132(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 21912925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain. Lewis JS; Valentine RE BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Mar; 11():39. PubMed ID: 20193055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing kyphosis with SpineScan: another attempt to reduce our dependence on radiography. Finestone AS; Marcus G; Anekstein Y; Mirovsky Y; Agar G Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):926-31. PubMed ID: 23669125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the flexible electrogoniometer for measuring thoracic kyphosis. Perriman DM; Scarvell JM; Hughes AR; Ashman B; Lueck CJ; Smith PN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):E633-40. PubMed ID: 20505565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. Lee SW; Hong JT; Son BC; Sung JH; Kim IS; Park CK J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 14(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 17646103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: a systematic review. Barrett E; McCreesh K; Lewis J Man Ther; 2014 Feb; 19(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 24246907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hyperkyphotic measures using distance from the wall: validity, reliability, and distance from the wall to indicate the risk for thoracic hyperkyphosis and vertebral fracture. Suwannarat P; Amatachaya P; Sooknuan T; Tochaeng P; Kramkrathok K; Thaweewannakij T; Manimmanakorn N; Amatachaya S Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Mar; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 29532182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between constrained and non-constrained Cobb techniques for the assessment of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Mac-Thiong JM; Pinel-Giroux FM; de Guise JA; Labelle H Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17426991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of thoracic kyphosis using the Debrunner kyphometer. Korovessis P; Petsinis G; Papazisis Z; Baikousis A J Spinal Disord; 2001 Feb; 14(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 11242276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Cobb angle in the measurement of vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis of traumatic lumbar spine fractures in the lateral X-ray. Ulmar B; Gühring M; Schmälzle T; Weise K; Badke A; Brunner A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1533-8. PubMed ID: 20424848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilty of measures of kyphosis in thoracolumbar fractures. Street J; Lenehan B; Albietz J; Bishop P; Dvorak M; Fisher C; Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 19356989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the occiput-wall distance valid and reliable to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis? Wiyanad A; Chokphukiao P; Suwannarat P; Thaweewannakij T; Wattanapan P; Gaogasigam C; Amatachaya P; Amatachaya S Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2018 Dec; 38():63-68. PubMed ID: 30278368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the sagittal Cobb* angle to guide the rod bending in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective clinical study. Shi Z; Wang G; Jin Z; Wu T; Wang H; Sun J; Nicolas YSM; Rupesh KC; Yang K; Liu J J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 15(1):574. PubMed ID: 33256851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]