These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2093940)
1. Inflammatory and traumatic lesions of the knee and ankle: comparison of 0.23 T and 2 T MRI. Mundinger A; Ioannidou M; Dinkel E; Beck A; Friedburg H; Sigmund G Radiat Med; 1990; 8(6):211-4. PubMed ID: 2093940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of positron emission tomography with methyl-11C-choline and 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of inflammatory proliferation of synovium. Roivainen A; Parkkola R; Yli-Kerttula T; Lehikoinen P; Viljanen T; Möttönen T; Nuutila P; Minn H Arthritis Rheum; 2003 Nov; 48(11):3077-84. PubMed ID: 14613269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging. Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [1.5-T MR of the knee: the correlations with arthroscopy]. Cerofolini E; Spina V; Miceli F; D'Alimonte P; Leoni A; Romagnoli R Radiol Med; 1989 May; 77(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 2748956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3T magnetic resonance imaging of ankle and hindfoot tendon pathology. Collins MS; Felmlee JP Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 20(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 20410804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The effect of the field strength on standardized MRI of the brain to demonstrate cranial nerves and vessels: a comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla]. Röttgen R; Haltaufderheide K; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herzog H; Neumann F; Lehmkuhl L; Winter L; Felix R; Bruhn H Rofo; 2005 Apr; 177(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 15838758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patellar cartilage lesions: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and T2 relaxation-time mapping. Hannila I; Nieminen MT; Rauvala E; Tervonen O; Ojala R Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 17453527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study. Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint. Schibany N; Ba-Ssalamah A; Marlovits S; Mlynarik V; Nöbauer-Huhmann IM; Striessnig G; Shodjai-Baghini M; Heinze G; Trattnig S Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 16036161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet. Rothschild PA; Domesek JM; Kaufman L; Kramer DM; Dye SF; Anderson LJ; Lewis JL; Gon MK Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 2343129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers. Stehling C; Vieth V; Bachmann R; Nassenstein I; Kugel H; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Fischbach R Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):428-34. PubMed ID: 17507815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traumatic knee injuries: the accuracy of MRI compared with arthroscopy. Ng J; Baron M; Ng AC; Bessette J; Vahey T; Shelbourne KD; Chua GT Indiana Med; 1989 Nov; 82(11):886-90. PubMed ID: 2614069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrist and ankle MRI of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: identification of unsuspected multicompartmental tenosynovitis and arthritis. Javadi S; Kan JH; Orth RC; DeGuzman M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):413-7. PubMed ID: 24450685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved preoperative evaluation of cerebral cavernomas by high-field, high-resolution susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison with standard (1.5 T) magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with histopathological findings--preliminary results. Pinker K; Stavrou I; Szomolanyi P; Hoeftberger R; Weber M; Stadlbauer A; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Knosp E; Trattnig S Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 17507804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]