These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20941310)

  • 1. Systematic and random errors in electronic speckle photography.
    Sjödahl M; Benckert LR
    Appl Opt; 1994 Nov; 33(31):7461-71. PubMed ID: 20941310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic speckle photography: increased accuracy by nonintegral pixel shifting.
    Sjödahl M
    Appl Opt; 1994 Oct; 33(28):6667-73. PubMed ID: 20941210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic speckle photography: measurement of in-plane strain fields through the use of defocused laser speckle.
    Sjödahl M
    Appl Opt; 1995 Sep; 34(25):5799-808. PubMed ID: 21060413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic speckle photography: analysis of an algorithm giving the displacement with subpixel accuracy.
    Sjödahl M; Benckert LR
    Appl Opt; 1993 May; 32(13):2278-84. PubMed ID: 20820381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decorrelation-induced phase errors in phase-shifting speckle interferometry.
    Lehmann M
    Appl Opt; 1997 Jun; 36(16):3657-67. PubMed ID: 18253388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of speckle displacement, decorrelation, and object-point location in imaging systems.
    Sjödahl M
    Appl Opt; 1995 Dec; 34(34):7998-8010. PubMed ID: 21068897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal re-referencing rate for in-plane dynamic speckle interferometry.
    Svanbro A; Huntley JM; Davila A
    Appl Opt; 2003 Jan; 42(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 12546504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-speed dynamic speckle interferometry: phase errors due to intensity, velocity, and speckle decorrelation.
    Davila A; Huntley JM; Kaufmann GH; Kerr D
    Appl Opt; 2005 Jul; 44(19):3954-62. PubMed ID: 16004040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speckle photography fringe analysis: effect of imaging geometry on displacement errors.
    Huntley JM
    Appl Opt; 1991 Nov; 30(32):4602-4. PubMed ID: 20717257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speckle photography fringe analysis: assessment of current algorithms.
    Huntley JM
    Appl Opt; 1989 Oct; 28(20):4316-22. PubMed ID: 20555869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum-likelihood analysis of speckle photography fringe patterns.
    Huntley JM
    Appl Opt; 1992 Aug; 31(23):4834-8. PubMed ID: 20725496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital speckle-displacement measurement using a complex spectrum method.
    Chen DJ; Chiang FP; Tan YS; Don HS
    Appl Opt; 1993 Apr; 32(11):1839-49. PubMed ID: 20820317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum determination of speckle size to be used in electronic speckle pattern interferometry.
    Yoshimura T; Zhou M; Yamahai K; Liyan Z
    Appl Opt; 1995 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 20963087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity fluctuation spectra of dynamic laser speckle patterns acquired by a full-field temporal modulation method.
    Wang D; Moyer A; Henderson M
    Appl Opt; 2012 Nov; 51(31):7576-80. PubMed ID: 23128705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
    Kumar S; Burke K; Nalder C; Jarrett P; Mubata C; A'hern R; Humphreys M; Bidmead M; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jan; 74(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15683670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional deformation field measurement with digital speckle correlation.
    Fricke-Begemann T
    Appl Opt; 2003 Dec; 42(34):6783-96. PubMed ID: 14661786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial submicron or nanometer speckle fabricating technique and electron microscope speckle photography.
    Liu Z; Xie H; Fang D; Dai F; Wang W; Fang Y
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Mar; 78(3):033101. PubMed ID: 17411172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel processing system for rapid analysis of speckle-photography and particle-image-velocimetry data.
    Huntley JM; Goldrein HT; Benckert LR
    Appl Opt; 1993 Jun; 32(17):3152-5. PubMed ID: 20829929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction of systematic setup errors in prostate radiation therapy: how many images to perform?
    Ludbrook JJ; Greer PB; Blood P; D'yachkova Y; Coldman A; Beckham WA; Runkel J; Olivotto IA
    Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 15922173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.