These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20941377)

  • 1. Debate on GMOs health risks after statistical findings in regulatory tests.
    de Vendômois JS; Cellier D; Vélot C; Clair E; Mesnage R; Séralini GE
    Int J Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 6(6):590-8. PubMed ID: 20941377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health.
    de Vendômois JS; Roullier F; Cellier D; Séralini GE
    Int J Biol Sci; 2009 Dec; 5(7):706-26. PubMed ID: 20011136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.
    Davison J; Ammann K
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 28278120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental risk assessment in GMO analysis.
    Pirondini A; Marmiroli N
    Riv Biol; 2008; 101(2):215-46. PubMed ID: 19048472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Derivation and interpretation of hazard quotients to assess ecological risks from the cultivation of insect-resistant transgenic crops.
    Raybould A; Caron-Lormier G; Bohan DA
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5877-85. PubMed ID: 21247173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
    Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in U.S. maize and soybeans.
    Perry ED; Ciliberto F; Hennessy DA; Moschini G
    Sci Adv; 2016 Aug; 2(8):e1600850. PubMed ID: 27652335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results from ten years of post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified MON 810 maize in the European Union.
    Bertho L; Schmidt K; Schmidtke J; Brants I; Cantón RF; Novillo C; Head G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0217272. PubMed ID: 32330131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Answers to critics: Why there is a long term toxicity due to a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide.
    Séralini GE; Mesnage R; Defarge N; Gress S; Hennequin D; Clair E; Malatesta M; de Vendômois JS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Mar; 53():476-83. PubMed ID: 23146697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. See what you eat--broad GMO screening with microarrays.
    von Götz F
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Mar; 396(6):1961-7. PubMed ID: 19862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GMO foods and crops: Africa's choice.
    Paarlberg R
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 20637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why genetically modified crops?
    Jones JD
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2011 May; 369(1942):1807-16. PubMed ID: 21464072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico.
    Heredia Díaz O; Aldaba Meza JL; Baltazar BM; Bojórquez Bojórquez G; Castro Espinoza L; Corrales Madrid JL; de la Fuente Martínez JM; Durán Pompa HA; Alonso Escobedo J; Espinoza Banda A; Garzón Tiznado JA; González García J; Guzmán Rodríguez JL; Madueño Martínez JI; Martínez Carrillo JL; Meng C; Quiñones Pando FJ; Rosales Robles E; Ruiz Hernández I; Treviño Ramírez JE; Uribe Montes HR; Zavala García F
    Transgenic Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):135-151. PubMed ID: 27771867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk-Only Assessment of Genetically Engineered Crops Is Risky.
    Herman RA; Zhuang M; Storer NP; Cnudde F; Delaney B
    Trends Plant Sci; 2019 Jan; 24(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30385102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semiautomated TaqMan PCR screening of GMO labelled samples for (unauthorised) GMOs.
    Scholtens IMJ; Molenaar B; van Hoof RA; Zaaijer S; Prins TW; Kok EJ
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2017 Jun; 409(15):3877-3889. PubMed ID: 28417173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a direct hybridization microarray strategy for comprehensive monitoring of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    Turkec A; Lucas SJ; Karacanli B; Baykut A; Yuksel H
    Food Chem; 2016 Mar; 194():399-409. PubMed ID: 26471572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The emerging international regulatory framework for biotechnology.
    Komen J
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 22430851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.