98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20941827)
1. Is cervical cancer screening necessary or the "Paradox" example of Bulgaria.
Kostova P; Zlatkov V
J BUON; 2010; 15(3):556-60. PubMed ID: 20941827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Providers' constructions of the role of women in cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and Romania.
Todorova IL; Baban A; Balabanova D; Panayotova Y; Bradley J
Soc Sci Med; 2006 Aug; 63(3):776-87. PubMed ID: 16603297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effectiveness of cervical screening - expectation and reality].
Kostova P; Zlatkov V
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000; 39(3):23-4. PubMed ID: 11187989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
Louhivuori K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
Znaor A; Strnad M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
Kostova P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mass screening for cervical cancer in Iceland during 1965-1969 and the effect on incidence and mortality.
Jóhannesson G; Geirsson G; Day N; Tulinius H
Cancer Detect Prev; 1982; 5(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 7127342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
Cox B; Borman B
N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer in New York State.
N Y State J Med; 1990 Oct; 90(10):521-2. PubMed ID: 2234628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer in India--strategy for control.
Prabhakar AK
Indian J Cancer; 1992 Sep; 29(3):104-13. PubMed ID: 1292993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Organization and results of cervical cancer screening in the German Democratic Republic.
Ebeling K; Nischan P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):251-66. PubMed ID: 3570410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark.
Lynge E; Madsen M; Engholm G
Cancer Res; 1989 Apr; 49(8):2157-60. PubMed ID: 2702657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The incidence of cervical cancer at the Center for Oncology Pleven in the period of 2001-2006 year].
Dilova P; Popova T; Atanassova K; Angelova A
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2008; 47 Suppl 3():56-9. PubMed ID: 19449723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [No effect of organized cervix cancer screening].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(11):1302; author reply 1302. PubMed ID: 18511980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
Magnus K; Langmark F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
