These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20942363)

  • 1. Does Thompson's Thatcher Effect reflect a face-specific mechanism?
    Wong YK; Twedt E; Sheinberg D; Gauthier I
    Perception; 2010; 39(8):1125-41. PubMed ID: 20942363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thatcher's children: development and the Thatcher illusion.
    Lewis MB
    Perception; 2003; 32(12):1415-21. PubMed ID: 14992420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces.
    Oruç I; Barton JJ
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):20. PubMed ID: 21047752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inversion and configuration of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Searcy J
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jul; 25(3):281-316. PubMed ID: 8354050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Thatcher illusion: rotating the viewer instead of the picture.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 17564200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ups and downs of face perception: evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.
    Murray JE
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 15222387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?
    Rossion B; Gauthier I
    Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev; 2002 Mar; 1(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 17715586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences between perception of human faces and body shapes: evidence from the composite illusion.
    Soria Bauser DA; Suchan B; Daum I
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 21093471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Haptic face recognition and prosopagnosia.
    Kilgour AR; de Gelder B; Lederman SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15037050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thompson's Margaret Thatcher illusion: when inversion fails.
    Rakover SS
    Perception; 1999; 28(10):1227-30. PubMed ID: 10694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of gaze direction in face viewpoint aftereffect.
    Bi T; Su J; Chen J; Fang F
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2322-7. PubMed ID: 19607854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion.
    Schiltz C; Dricot L; Goebel R; Rossion B
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):25.1-16. PubMed ID: 20462326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion.
    Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25301017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.
    Epstein RA; Higgins JS; Parker W; Aguirre GK; Cooperman S
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1145-58. PubMed ID: 16303149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural Correlate of the Thatcher Face Illusion in a Monkey Face-Selective Patch.
    Taubert J; Van Belle G; Vanduffel W; Rossion B; Vogels R
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9872-8. PubMed ID: 26156988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition times for rotated normal and "Thatcher" faces.
    Sjoberg W; Windes J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Dec; 75(3 Pt 2):1176-8. PubMed ID: 1484782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW; Praamstra P; Warbrick T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):352-67. PubMed ID: 16632381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.
    Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17054923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential sensitivity to rotations of facial features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Riby DM; Riby LM; Reay JL
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):721-6. PubMed ID: 20099533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiments with a hollow mask and a reverspective: top-down influences in the inversion effect for 3-D stimuli.
    Papathomas TV; Bono LM
    Perception; 2004; 33(9):1129-38. PubMed ID: 15560511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.