These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20942730)

  • 1. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
    Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
    Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
    Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
    Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
    Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.
    Hwang JY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam MY
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 26256979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening Outcomes of Mammography with AI in Dense Breasts: A Comparative Study with Supplemental Screening US.
    Ha SM; Jang MJ; Youn I; Yoen H; Ji H; Lee SH; Yi A; Chang JM
    Radiology; 2024 Jul; 312(1):e233391. PubMed ID: 39041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
    Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of breast lesions detected at screening ultrasonography.
    Kim SJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Chung SY; Han W; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3229-33. PubMed ID: 22591758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Undiagnosed Breast Cancer: Features at Supplemental Screening US.
    Song SE; Cho N; Chu A; Shin SU; Yi A; Lee SH; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 26069925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
    Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic and ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
    Kim MY; Choi N
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 23761558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.