These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20942925)

  • 1. Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study.
    Harms MC; Peers CE; Chase D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Oct; 11():236. PubMed ID: 20942925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the functional rating index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability.
    Chansirinukor W; Maher CG; Latimer J; Hush J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 15626994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
    Davidson M; Keating JL
    Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain.
    Katzan IL; Thompson NR; George SZ; Passek S; Frost F; Stilphen M
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):645-654. PubMed ID: 30308254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.
    Heneweer H; Aufdemkampe G; van Tulder MW; Kiers H; Stappaerts KH; Vanhees L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 17334295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial.
    Lamb SE; Lall R; Hansen Z; Castelnuovo E; Withers EJ; Nichols V; Griffiths F; Potter R; Szczepura A; Underwood M;
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Aug; 14(41):1-253, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 20807469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological predictors of recovery from low back pain: a prospective study.
    George SZ; Beneciuk JM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():49. PubMed ID: 25849159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognosis of sciatica and back-related leg pain in primary care: the ATLAS cohort.
    Konstantinou K; Dunn KM; Ogollah R; Lewis M; van der Windt D; Hay EM;
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 29174459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.
    Carragee EJ; Alamin TF; Miller JL; Carragee JM
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 15653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting 7-day and 3-month functional outcomes after an ED visit for acute nontraumatic low back pain.
    Friedman BW; Mulvey L; Davitt M; Choi H; Esses D; Bijur PE; Gallagher EJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):1852-9. PubMed ID: 22633712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognosis and course of disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a 5- and 12-month follow-up cohort study.
    Verkerk K; Luijsterburg PA; Heymans MW; Ronchetti I; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Miedema HS; Koes BW
    Phys Ther; 2013 Dec; 93(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 23824781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time.
    Grotle M; Brox JI; Veierød MB; Glomsrød B; Lønn JH; Vøllestad NK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):976-82. PubMed ID: 15834343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic factors of prolonged disability in patients with chronic low back pain and lumbar degeneration in primary care: a cohort study.
    Wilkens P; Scheel IB; Grundnes O; Hellum C; Storheim K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 22718223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.
    Pengel LH; Refshauge KM; Maher CG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):879-83. PubMed ID: 15082988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.
    Ostelo RW; Deyo RA; Stratford P; Waddell G; Croft P; Von Korff M; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18165753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care?
    Grotle M; Foster NE; Dunn KM; Croft P
    Pain; 2010 Dec; 151(3):790-797. PubMed ID: 20932646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diazepam Is No Better Than Placebo When Added to Naproxen for Acute Low Back Pain.
    Friedman BW; Irizarry E; Solorzano C; Khankel N; Zapata J; Zias E; Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 70(2):169-176.e1. PubMed ID: 28187918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Satisfaction as a predictor of clinical outcomes among chiropractic and medical patients enrolled in the UCLA low back pain study.
    Hurwitz EL; Morgenstern H; Yu F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2121-8. PubMed ID: 16205336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.
    Jones GT; Johnson RE; Wiles NJ; Chaddock C; Potter RG; Roberts C; Symmons DP; Macfarlane GJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 May; 56(526):334-41. PubMed ID: 16638248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.