These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20942984)

  • 21. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
    Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Decision-making in priority setting for medicines--a review of empirical studies.
    Vuorenkoski L; Toiviainen H; Hemminki E
    Health Policy; 2008 Apr; 86(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17950484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences.
    Gibson JL; Martin DK; Singer PA
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(11):2355-62. PubMed ID: 15950347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The mechanism of implementation of managerial decisions to effectively carry out priority national projects on health care].
    Ivanenko AV; Likstanov MI; Beliavskiĭ AR; Safonkina SG; Kicha DI; Breusov AV
    Gig Sanit; 2009; (6):14-7. PubMed ID: 20135860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Defining the clinical improvement in cancer drug therapy: implications for priority setting in healthcare.
    de Lemos ML
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2006 Jun; 12(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16984747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Priority dilemmas in psoriasis care and visions of a future care in a group of administrators, politicians and professionals in northern Sweden.
    Uttjek M; Dufåker M; Stenberg B; Nygren L
    Health Policy; 2008 Aug; 87(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18302973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
    Wester G; Bringedal B
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The discipline called Medicine and the new priorities presented in the 1985 Stimulation of Health Research Program].
    Querido A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Feb; 131(7):278-84. PubMed ID: 3561569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The curriculum Health Technology Assessment (HTA)].
    Perleth M; Gerhardus A; Lühmann D; Rüther A;
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 16878799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Policy formulation and technology assessment.
    Banta HD; Behney CJ
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1981; 59(3):445-79. PubMed ID: 6792555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prioritisation of telemedicine services for large scale implementation in Norway.
    Norum J; Pedersen S; Størmer J; Rumpsfeld M; Stormo A; Jamissen N; Sunde H; Ingebrigtsen T; Larsen ML
    J Telemed Telecare; 2007; 13(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 17565774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems.
    Douw K; Vondeling H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 16571193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preferences for the normative basis of health care priority setting: some evidence from two countries.
    Olsen JA; Richardson J
    Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 22(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 22359416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality improvement perspective and healthcare funding decisions.
    Bloomfield A; Logan R
    BMJ; 2003 Aug; 327(7412):439-43. PubMed ID: 12933735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice.
    Oortwijn WJ; Vondeling H; van Barneveld T; van Vugt C; Bouter LM
    Health Policy; 2002 Dec; 62(3):227-42. PubMed ID: 12385849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle.
    Altmann S
    J Med Ethics; 2018 May; 44(5):305-309. PubMed ID: 29321220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adoption of new health care services in Norway (1993-1997): specialists' self-assessment according to national criteria for priority setting.
    Norheim OF; Ekeberg O; Evensen SA; Halvorsen M; Kvernebo K
    Health Policy; 2001 Apr; 56(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 11230909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Priority setting: learning to make tough decisions.
    Benatar SR
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1185-6. PubMed ID: 12933915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential health and economic consequences of misplaced priorities.
    Woolf SH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):523-6. PubMed ID: 17284703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.