These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2094302)

  • 1. Do optimal dipoles obtained by the dipole tracing method always suggest true source locations?
    Musha T; Homma S
    Brain Topogr; 1990; 3(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 2094302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.
    Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: the effect of dipole source configuration on dipolarity using single dipole models.
    Hara J; Musha T; Shankle WR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 9932333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source estimation in the human brain from EEG based on the SSB Head Model.
    Musha T; Ivanov V; Konyshev V
    Methods Inf Med; 1994 Mar; 33(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 8177061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dipole-tracing method applied to human brain potentials.
    Homma S; Nakajima Y; Musha T; Okamoto Y; He B
    J Neurosci Methods; 1987 Oct; 21(2-4):195-200. PubMed ID: 3682875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conductivity ratios of the scalp-skull-brain head model in estimating equivalent dipole sources in human brain.
    Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE
    Neurosci Res; 1995 Mar; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 7792082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study.
    Kybartaite A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head?
    Roth BJ; Balish M; Gorbach A; Sato S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Oct; 87(4):175-84. PubMed ID: 7691548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models.
    Berg P; Scherg M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 7509274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
    He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ictal dipole source analysis based on a realistic scalp-skull-brain head model in localizing the epileptogenic zone.
    Mine S; Iwasa H; Kasagi Y; Yamaura A
    Neurosci Res; 2005 Apr; 51(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 15740808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.