These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2094303)

  • 1. Modeling and source localization of MEG activities.
    Ueno S; Iramina K
    Brain Topogr; 1990; 3(1):151-65. PubMed ID: 2094303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source estimation of spontaneous MEG activity and auditory evoked responses in normal subjects during sleep.
    Iramina K; Ueno S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 8728422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On noninvasive source imaging of the human K-complex.
    Wennberg R; Cheyne D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 124(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 23200316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biophysically detailed forward modeling of the neural origin of EEG and MEG signals.
    Næss S; Halnes G; Hagen E; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Einevoll GT; Ness TV
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117467. PubMed ID: 33075556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
    Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG.
    Haueisen J; Tuch DS; Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Wedeen VJ; George JS; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 11771984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cuffin BN; Cohen D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MEG and EEG topography of frontal midline theta rhythm and source localization.
    Iramina K; Ueno S; Matsuoka S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 8728427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1793693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional localization of brain sources using EEG and/or MEG data: volume conductor and source models.
    Lopes da Silva F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1533-8. PubMed ID: 15707802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.